|
...Tonight there is some kid in the Black Belt who will go to sleep in a tar paper shack where the wet winter air slips in through the cracks in the walls and floor. His grandparents are using the soiled quilts for warmth since they got sick and can't afford their medication anymore. In the morning, this youngster will put on threadbare clothes and walk down a dirt road to a dilapidated schoolhouse while his parents wonder where the next meal is coming from or when decent jobs are coming to their county.
If you don't believe the picture I'm painting, then you haven't spent any time in rural Alabama. And you don't even have to leave the state's largest cities in a lot cases to find similar scenarios.
I'm from Alabama. If you think poverty is unique to Alabama, you haven't traveled enough. Spare me the moralizing lecture.
Why don't you go tell those children how great and wonderful it is that Alabamians don't blink twice about spending a king's ransom on a football coach so some folks can boost their fragile self-esteem through the intermittent exploits of some young men on a grass field?
I get it-- we're all supposed to forgo luxuries since some people live in poverty. By that reasoning, no superfluous spending on: football movies a day at the golf course vacations cable t.v. etc. etc. etc....
You're displaying a very puritanical, self-righteous attitude. Are you sure that's the approach you want to take to combat poverty?
A football coach is an investment. A good one will bring the winning seasons, BCS bowls, advertising money, etc. that are worth much more than the cost of his salary. Nick Saban already did it at LSU. At UA, the football program brings in enough revenue to fund all the other sports they compete in (women's and men's) plus millions left over to contribute to the academic budget. Tax money does not fund his salary or any other part of the athletic department. It is self-supporting, and then some. So how are we taking food out that kid's mouth? See the false dichotomy you set up there?
Rationalizing and discounting national critique as inevitable sounds like the work of an extremely provincial, xenophobic and CONSERVATIVE mind. Are you sure that's the approach you want to take? If someone from New York says Fob James was a jackass, does that make it irrelevant?
I live outside Alabama (while visiting frequently), and I've seen enough of the cheap shots that the media takes at the state and the University's athletic program to take many of them with a grain of salt. Are there serious socio-economic and environmental problems in Alabama? Of course. Is there racism? Absolutely. Many of Alabama's problems are more acute and in-grained than other states, but that doesn't mean they are the exclusive domain of Alabama or the south in general. I care very much about the world's perception of Alabama, but to expect Alabama leaders' decisions to be guided by focus groups and opinion polls and national pundits with various axes to grind is ludicrous.
Even sadder is the way so many citizens are crowing about it. "It don't matter how ig'nant and po' we is lawng as we kin whup yo' butt on Sat'dy! Yee-haw!" Another insulting, cheap shot, laid on with a broad brush.
Oh, and the image of Wallace in the schoolhouse door? I didn't come up with that one, that came straight from the mind of a man who has been writing and spearheading legislation for the last year-and-a-half trying to spawn a rural development center in Alabama so that the Heart of Dixie can at least make some effort to raise its less fortunate citizenry from cyclical poverty. He said David Bronner's efforts through his media network over the last decade to market this state to the nation and world as finally being ready for progress were all undone yesterday in Tuscaloosa. He compared the damage to that from George C. in the schoolhouse doorway in the same town.
As long as we're on Bronner, he created and executed the concept of the Robert Trent Jones golf trail, bud. Hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money were used to build golf courses for the elite to chase a little white ball over a grassy field, all while your allegorical child suffered. Pick another source for anti-UA hyperbole.
But I guess he's "cheap" too because he cares about more than college football. Yeah, golf for the fat-cats.
|