|
The original suggestion is just nonsense.
Foster's actions would probably be nonsensical for someone from an urban area, but from a bush seat it does make a lot of sense, and from Nome might be the only way to continue being elected!
Bush voters don't really care much about Democrat vs. Republican. It's much more oriented towards urban vs bush. And a lot of bush people are basically very conservative, hence they do like at least the rhetoric of the Republican Party. The trouble is they also want action and they want action that affects problems in the bush, and the Democrats win hands down on those issues.
Hence being a Democrat suggests having ones heart in the right place for many many bush issues. Working with whoever happens to be the majority suggests being able to get something done rather than just talk about it on the campaign trail.
Look at history. Hohman from Bethel, Sackett from the Yukon, Hammond from Bristol Bay, Foster and Olsen from Nome, Carl Morgan and Lyman Hoffman from the Kuskokwim, Reggie Joule and before him Furguson and Adams all of Kotzebue... a long list that leaves out even more! Virtually none of them engaged in partisan politics, and probably most people can't name which party half of them actually belonged to!
|