|
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 10:34 AM by Humor_In_Cuneiform
Anyone know WHAT she is referring to???
:wtf:
"Hello,
Due to the volume of emails I have received on SCR 1013, I am sending out this auto-response while I wade through each individual email. If your email was not in relation to the striker amendment related to Clean Elections on this bill, please resend your email with no mention of "1013" in the subject line so it will not be inadvertently sorted to that folder.
In regards to 1013…
The Clean Elections system is wrought with errors that deny you, the voter, your rights and freedoms guaranteed to you by our U.S. Constitution. Specifically, it denies you your right to Free Speech, but it also limits your ability to participate in the political process by awarding matching money to candidates you would never have supported because they do not represent your ideals.
Additionally, the Clean Elections complaint process has become little more than a political witch hunt with certain people being given a "pass" on following the rules and others being drawn and quartered by biased judges who also happen to be the investigators, the police and the jury. This agency is not under the jurisdiction of any other branch of government, yet controls the outcomes of elections and determines who will stay elected after you have cast your vote.
A nice idea, perhaps. But, in practice, a disaster for democracy.
SCR 1013 simply gives you, the voter, the opportunity to undo the "experiment" and take us back to our imperfect but tried and true system of campaign finance of the last couple of hundred years. Voters may choose to keep this broken system they tried on for the last few election cycles. I support giving voters that choice."
|