Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Speier Introduces Bill to Allow Local Dog Breed-Specific Ordinances

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 11:33 PM
Original message
Speier Introduces Bill to Allow Local Dog Breed-Specific Ordinances
Speier Introduces Bill to Allow Local Dog Breed-Specific Ordinances

A Bay Area legislator is introducing legislation that would amend state law to allow local municipalities to use spay/neuter and breeding restrictions to regulate specific dog breeds.

The action comes on the heels of six known pit bull attacks on humans this month, including the fatal mauling of a San Francisco boy.

Senate Bill 861, sponsored by state Sen. Jackie Speier, D-Hillsborough, was approved by the Assembly Local Government Committee on a 4-2 today and now moves for debate to the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

San Francisco is already moving toward stricter dog ownership regulations, but cannot enact ones targeting dog breeds with a tendency toward aggressiveness or viciousness without a change in state law. The city's mayor, Gavin Newsom, has proposed, for example, that owners of specific aggressive breeds be required to carry liability insurance, as well as neuter or spay those pets. Dogs not neutered or spayed would be seized by the city and altered at the owner's expense. The proposed regulations would also require microchips be implanted in certain breeds for quicker identification. What's termed "backyard breeding" would be disallowed.

http://www.kxtv10.com/storyfull1.asp?id=11747
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ignoramus Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are the tv stations getting paid off to do this propaganda?
Edited on Thu Jun-30-05 08:33 PM by Ignoramus
I was wondering what could be behind this obvious invented dog bite "epidemic". Obviously, there can't be such a thing as a dog bite epidemic. They are inventing an epidemic by choosing to report stories about dog bites, identifying their reports as a pattern and putting links to grouped information about their coverage of "the rash of dog bites".

Then, I read this, and also they were talking about it on the tv along with their dog bite skit. The tv story said insurance companies will deny coverage for dog bites from specific breeds.

I bet someone from an insurance company or an organized group of property owners is influencing the tv news to engage in this propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nikraye Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. ASPCA OPPOSES this Bill. So should everyone who loves animals...
Go to ASPCA's action alert website and contact CA's legislature opposing such "breed specific" legislation!

Speier's bill is a knee-jerk reaction to the June 2005 mauling of a SF boy. If you knew the specifics behind the family who owned the Pit Bulls in this case, you would KNOW it was the white trash human owners, not the dogs, who are responsible for the boy's death.

Don't punish an entire breed for the misdeeds of irresponsible humans.

Punish the humans!

https://secure2.convio.net/aspca/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=1693&autologin=true&JServSessionIdr006=jtwt1k9871.app28a

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC