Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State GOP delegates give Schwarzenegger early endorsement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:36 PM
Original message
State GOP delegates give Schwarzenegger early endorsement
State GOP delegates give Schwarzenegger early endorsement

By TOM CHORNEAU, Associated Press Writer


Last Updated: February 12, 2005, 05:00:32 PM PST


SACRAMENTO (AP) - While Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger remains quiet about his plans for re-election, a key committee of the California Republican Party agreed Saturday to a rule change that would allow an early endorsement of the popular governor.

Saying rival Democrats are already raising money for their 2006 gubernatorial candidates, state GOP Chairman Duf Sundheim asked for the rule change so that his party will be able to pay for some early expenses - such as bulk mailing - for Schwarzenegger should he decide to run next year.

"The Democrats are doing it as we speak," Sundheim said. "If we don't, it would put us at a real disadvantage."

The routine issue that typically would receive little attention sparked a controversy Friday when a longtime GOP activist, Dora Kingsley, resigned her seat on the party rules committee over the proposal.

Kingsley, who has not returned calls from The Associated Press and did not attend Saturday's committee, said in a letter distributed to the press that the change could "lead to loss of the voters' confidence" by discouraging challengers.

more...
http://www.modbee.com/state_wire/story/9945187p-10785295c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. California, I love you. Now, please answer this for a native son.
Why doesn't the CA Democratic Party or the Teachers Union or some Democratic group out there load up and run ads attacking Arnold by using the Ken Lay-Arnold-Riordan meeting.http://www.dailykos.net/archives/004435.html This is dynamite, it is simple, and it has a core grievance. He's a shill and a liar.

Why isn't this done? Are the CA Democrats going to just give up and let steroid-boy have his way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. California does have an institutional budgetary problem and Dems
get the blame. The budget needs to be made (somehow) 'pay as you go'. Arnold is using the 1992 TABOR Taxpayer Bill of Rights model from Colorado
http://www.idtaxreform.com/TABOR/ARRNOLDTABOR.htm

Look now and you see after 14 years that CO is electing Dems. That's because the inflation/popgrowth limits on budget growth require an initial year that was decently funded to begin with.

CA's budget process is messed up with local county gov spending coming from Property tax, where big business gets a huge break (since they don't move on ave every 7 years like people do) and the businesses already get favorable treatment from said counties -- but on the other hand, worker's comp and unfunded mandates, along with huge immigrant populations (both legal visa and illegals) make businesses break even especially the globalized corporations, who Warren Buffett says should pay more "Warren Buffett Urges Higher Corporate Taxes"
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0306-01.htm

We need to see what the percapita spending needs of CA really are and go through the rough few years it will take to achieve this TABOR, OR we need to tax corporations more and admit they've gotten a better deal than Joe Sixpack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Debs, ARU would be proud of that analysis
That's the rational side of it. What about going after Arnold on the Enron thing. I suspect people have not forgotten about the power crisis. Davis failed to make the case about fraud but the facts about gaming the system are now out there, some on tape I believe.

Does any Democratic entity have the nerve to play hardball and go after Arnold?

BTW, the really sad thing about CA is the proposition process. Growing up there, I just assumed every state had it. When I lived in NYC I asked why they didn't and was told "What do you think, we're nuts!" The publics wish list without having to account for funding is the ultimate nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. With 20+ CIA on Enron's payroll the company was proprietary
which is why you're not seeing Lay's trial. The blowback of it all. It could take out not just Cheney's coverup but most of the WH. Too bad no special prosecutor law is around now when you need it; Dems shortsightedly threw it away in June 1999. Dumb.

Arnold made a point of getting federal aid, since he's 'tight' with the Prez. That's also useless bicep-flexing that's gone nowhere. CA is a blue donor state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Autorank...what is ARU ? Couldn't find it on a google search
but some weird ones Australian rugby union etc came up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. American Railway Union...
Debs crew. Keep the faith!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. hope he doesn't run, but I suppose my chances are slim
on that one. Being a movie star and child athletic program director suit him much better IMO. He carpetbagged his way into office and exactly what has he done for CA????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Tsk, does Anhuld need a boost now?
I don't expect they would have greased the skids for him,
if he didn't need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC