UNION-TRIBUNE EDITORIAL
The wrong choice
Ban on write-ins would limit democracy
February 20, 2005
Why is it that whenever the San Diego City Council comes to a fork in the road, it so often seems to go the wrong way?
The latest dart down the wrong road came Wednesday when the council's Rules Committee voted 4-0 to ban write-in candidates from municipal general elections. Councilman Scott Peters was absent for that vote, but two weeks earlier he voted along with the others in directing the city attorney's office to prepare the ordinance that was approved Wednesday.
(snip)
This ordinance is a spinoff of last year's mayoral election. The race began as a drab rerun of 2000, with Murphy and county Supervisor Ron Roberts again squaring off. But the rematch turned into farce when, on Sept. 30, shortly before the legal deadline and less than five weeks before election day, Councilwoman Donna Frye jumped into the race as a write-in candidate.
For those who may have been in hibernation the past five months, let's just say the gentle councilwoman shook things up a bit. Taking advantage of growing public anger over the City Hall pension fund crisis, as well as her own considerable populist appeal, Frye nearly pulled it off. In fact, she would have won but for the failure of 5,551 voters to fill in the oval bubble after writing in Frye's name. After the inevitable half-dozen or so court challenges, Murphy was declared the winner by 2,108 votes.
(snip)
In choosing to ban write-ins, the committee reflected legitimate concerns that such last-minute guerrilla campaigns like Frye's are grossly unfair – to the other candidates who were required to slug it out in the primary, and to voters.
(snip)
Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050220/news_lz1ed20bottom.html