Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the simplest explanation of the ratchet effect?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Colorado Donate to DU
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 01:32 PM
Original message
What is the simplest explanation of the ratchet effect?
I'm not understanding this all. I understand the consequences, but I don't understand WHY it works this way.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's my understanding....
Edited on Mon Oct-17-05 09:16 PM by pointsoflight
TABOR limits the increase in spending from one year to the next to a very small percentage of the current budget. Although that may sound reasonable, the problem is that TABOR doesn't include any provisions that limit the size of budget cuts during tough times or allow for a recovery to those cuts when things get better. When you have a recession and the budget dramatically shrinks, you can't ramp the budget back up when you come out of the recession. Your tied to a small percentage increase that's calculated based on the current, deflated, recessionary budget.

The net result is that cuts which were forced by a recession essentially become permanent. Doesn't matter how severe the cuts were to the state's health, and doesn't matter how healthy the economy has become.

Here's an analogy that I like. Imagine you have a job in which you make $60K per year. Your company gets hit hard by a recession, so you're asked to take a pay cut to $45K. You dramatically cut your spending given the pay cut. Now the recession ends and your pay goes back up to $60K. The TABOR ratchet effect is equivalent to a mandate which says that despite your income returning to $60K, you're only allowed to spend what your $45K salary allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. self-delete
Edited on Tue Oct-18-05 06:03 PM by politicat
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Damien Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Dillion lake (sp?)
Before the draught a few years back, the lake was full. When we had a draught, it was very low. When it the draught ended, the lake refilled. Had the lake been regulated by TABOR, however, we would only have allowed the lake to refill 1% beyond what it was in the draught year rather than filling back up.

Our economy is like the lake -- we don't let the state recover after recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Bingo
Instead of basing next year's limits on the drought year previous, Ref C says the baseline is the best of the previous 5 years -- in this case, financially, last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because Bruce is a mean spirited,manipulative, anti government ass hole.
Don't tell anyone I actually said that. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Colorado Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC