http://www.norwichbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060227/OPINION03/602270308/1014/OPINIONpublished today Monday, Feb. 27, 2006
U.S. Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., termed Ned Lamont's primary challenge to U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman "harmful" to Democrats' efforts to win back control of Congress. ("Greenwich Democrat sets sight on Senate," Feb. 23)
What a defeatist attitude. On top of that, what an incorrect analysis of primaries Dodd has.
Lieberman should consider himself lucky that he has to undergo a job review only once every six years, and he hasn't undergone a Democratic review since 1988. We ordinary Americans undergo a job review at least once per year.
Primaries are about reviewing a candidate's capabilities and holding office-holders accountable for their decisions and actions by the party that they claim to support. Primaries are part of the democratic process, Sen. Dodd.
Contrary to what Dodd says, it's Lieberman who is divisive. When President Bush needs a Democrat to cover his bad decisions or incompetence, he can count on Lieberman to enthusiastically attack fellow Democrats for behaving like a true opposition party.
Lieberman is long overdue for a job review. He is a public servant, and we are his employers.