Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Race (GA) gets political (Bush stooge Wiggins running)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Georgia Donate to DU
 
Charlie Brown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 08:09 PM
Original message
Supreme Court Race (GA) gets political (Bush stooge Wiggins running)
Edited on Sun Oct-15-06 08:24 PM by Charlie Brown
I advise everyonoe to remember to vote for Hunstein next month. Wiggins is a neo-con.

http://www.ajc.com/services/content/metro/stories/2006/10/12/1012metsupreme.html?cxtype=rss&cxsvc=7&cxcat=13

To hear the candidates tell it, the race between them is a contest over the Georgia Supreme Court's very soul.

Justice Carol Hunstein, 62, of Decatur, is a 14-year veteran of the court and its presiding justice. Former Bush administration lawyer Mike Wiggins, 53, of Atlanta is an unabashed Republican in the officially nonpartisan race.

Wiggins says he believes the state's highest court is beholden to plaintiffs' lawyers and out of touch with mainstream citizens. He calls his opponent a liberal who legislates from the bench. For instance, he said, she joined other justices five years ago in declaring the electrocution of condemned killers unconstitutional.

Hunstein argues that the judiciary must be safeguarded from partisan politics and ideologies and let the law guide it. She says she isn't publicly affiliated with any political party, and state records show she has voted in Democratic and Republican primaries.

Hunstein disputes her opponent's characterizations of her. Twenty-one district attorneys have endorsed her. "I think that's a clear indication that they do not perceive me as being soft on crime," she said.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the info
I'm voting straight Dem on my ticket anyway but it's good to have the facts so thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. yeah, I saw a Wiggins ad the other day. I wanted to hurl.
I'll be voting for Hunstein.

Heck, I'd vote for a yellow dog if it were running on the Democratic side of that race!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wiggins has also been doing some very shady push polling via
telephone.

From my husband's blog:

Friday, September 22, 2006
Offensive Phone Call from Republican Pollster
If Sonny Perdue were caught raping your grandmother, while shooting a spotted owl over his shoulder, would you be more inclined to vote for him, less inclined to vote for him, or would it make no difference?

If Casey Cagle was spotted defecating on a copy of the Constitution while wearing a Klu Klux Klan robe, would you be more inclined to vote for him, less inclined to vote for him, or would it make no difference?

Of course these are ridiculous questions, and I would never stoop so low as to such a tactic just to win an election... No Really, why are you looking at me like that?

I know, I know, you're saying to yourself "What the Hell are you talking about?" Sunday Sept. 17th in the evening, I got a strange phone call from a man with a slight accent (outsourced?) saying he was conducting a poll and did I have a few minutes. Ok, that right there set off alarm bells, a "few minutes" always means you'll be late for work, write it down.

Just a few minutes into the survey, poll, push poll, whatever you call it, I could tell this was not an objective poll. Actually, are there any objective polls, when it comes to politics? "Polls are only as accurate as the framing of their questions," according to the Progressive Handbook, chapter one, by the Rockridge Institute. And it was obvious to me from the outset, that this was being conducted for a Republican or conservative candidate, when the "pollster" asked me a question which used the term "trial lawyers." So anyway, by the end of the poll, I forgot about objectivity and curiosity because I lost it. One question pissed me off, and I lost my cool. I told the "pollster" that he should be ashamed of being involved in what was obviously a push poll concerning the State Supreme Court elecion between Justice Carol W. Hunstein vs Perdue waterboy Mike Wiggins. Sorry for paraphrasing here, but I can't remember the exact words. The question went something like this: "Would knowing Carol Hunstein said adult pedophiles that solicit sex from children over the phone should not be prossecuted make you more inclined to vote for her, less inclined to vote for her, or would it make no difference?" After an exchange with Tim from Dekalb and my State House candidate, I'm 99% certain that this was not a push poll, but a field test for certain "messaging" strategies. A push poll, said a friend, generally asks no more than one or two questions, unlike this phone call which lasted at least 10 minutes. Also, my State House candidate claimed he hired a firm to conduct similar research, and that there was one question that was similarly inflamatory, so he had them take it out of the survey because it was too over the top. Apparently, Mike Wiggins has no qualms with absurd questions like the one I was asked.

A google search of the phone number yielded some interesting results concerning a firm called Venture Data3, and on one of it's pages is a curious statement concerning push polls.

Since then, I used the email link to Justice Carol Hunstein's campaign and told them about the call, agreed to put her yard sign in front of our home, and contacted all of my friends, especially in West Ga., to post signs and put out the word for Hunstein!

# posted by BEZERKO : 9:31 AM 1 comments


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hunstein got my vote today
Just mailed my absentee ballot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Just FYI
Justice Hunstein is the most liberal justice on the GA Supreme Court. Take a look at what the state bar thinks of her and her opponent.

http://www.gabar.org/public/pdf/news/judicial_06.pdf

Wiggins is, quite simply, not qualified to sit on the Court, imho.

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Georgia Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC