|
Edited on Sat Aug-11-07 08:54 AM by EST
survival instinct, dunno, but there is just something wrong with this picture. Yes, I'm a bit of a purist. With the broad changes sweeping the party and the standards of ethics being demanded as the scale we measure ourselves against, the parties of old just don't apply anymore.
I will not accept hypocrisy, nor do most of the humans I regard as responsible voices. War-mongering, cloaked as bringing freedom, undue interference in foreign governments, support of terrorism (yes, the US has been and is a big sponsor of terrorism-look at the governments we've toppled and the nastiness surrounding them.)
The long history of half truths, outright lies, treating the American public as poorly developed eight-year-olds, os and on, is coming to an end.
With that in mind, that this ain't your grampa's democratic party, I don't think this man should be allowed or welcomed. Maybe he should go through some initiation rites, build a pyramid at Abu Ghraib or eat worms or something.
We demand a standard of ethics and morals that rapeblickers, as a general rule, just can't qualify for. We don't need all these publickers in democratic clothing, playing turncoat so they can remain in politics and taint it with their peculiar brand of eco-poison.
I have a suggestion: We help these quislings to form their own party, in protest of the deep doodoo that the neo-clowns and their confederates are spreading around. It's a trial party and we will commit to providing some assistance and ethical leadership for them, as well as some support for their legislative agenda, if it's progressive enough.
Let's call it the "Democrat" party, separate and distinct from the Democratic or Republican parties, but with some blue-dog identify of its own. This should also put an end to the nasty habit of wingnuts of being insulting by corrupting the name of "democratic" while whining about imagined mistreatment by us and whimpering about not "unnastanin' it."
|