Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

does anyone here think that Loebsack would have been a better choice for senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Iowa Donate to DU
 
KeepCongressBlue Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:08 PM
Original message
does anyone here think that Loebsack would have been a better choice for senate?
I for one think so because he doesn't have the dirty laundry that Conlin does. Conlin of course had a DUI in the 1990s, and has been criticized for not paying taxes, and also for running a controversial slumlord business. Second, Loebsack did the unthinkable four years ago by unseating a 15-term incumbent. Third, he has political experience. Conlin has never held an office in her life and its been 28 years since she ran for an office.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Braley would have been a better choice
That being said, I will support Conlin because grassley has to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cairycat Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, Loebsack would have been better, for the reasons you mentioned
Edited on Wed Aug-04-10 07:33 PM by Cairycat
and I also think Braley would be an excellent choice.

But, realistically, this race is an uphill climb and it would be for whoever we would have nominated. If we lose this race, it doesn't change the balance. If, when Harkin retires, we don't run someone really strong, it will change the balance. I would love to see both senate seats be blue, but I'd rather have one than none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
IADEMO2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is dirty laundry---rurallib post 28-3-2008 Grassley in Tipton
Cut from Reply #2
http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=152x22380

He started by saying the huge difference in wages should be looked at. He then too a short break. I was totally caught off guard by what followed. The way he stated it was 'some people get $25 an hour. Their wages need to come down and get more in line with what the Chinese make. Then we can start making stuff over here again.'

end cut


Eat it Chuck. Just Go Home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. thanks for reminding me of this. I feel an LTTE coming on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-09-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Neither Loebsack, nor Braley ran. Conlin is a good candidate
and as usual for a democrat is not given a fair shake while Grassley could run over an old lady and be praised.
-
Taxes? I don't know the details, but I understand she and her husband had tax credits from building low rent housing and the media has totally distorted it.
-
Slumlord? Really? could you back that up? I do not know DM but slumlord is a pretty nasty charge.
-
DUI? yes she made a mistake, a serious one. She no longer drinks. She has many times over tried to make amends. When someone does this, I am willing to forgive even Republicans who err. If the remorse is sincere and there is a change. Something about ye who have not sinned cast the first stone......
-
Loebsack's victory was truly remarkable. But it wasn't Dave alone who beat Leach. It was the hard work by thousands of volunteers making calls, writing LTTEs, knocking doors, marching in parades. Dave knows it was the work of thousands.
And in order for any Democrat to unseat Grassley it will take even a greater effort.
-
But if you think keeping one of the worst senators in the senate is worth getting back at Roxanne for some of her sins, so be it.
Remember Chuck will screw six ways from Sunday in another term.
Perhaps someone would care to list Chuck's sins in a post.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Iowa Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC