|
Edited on Sat Nov-06-10 12:12 PM by RBInMaine
Hi Maine DUers. Here is what happened. I worked the ground hard and know the inside workings pretty well. I would really appreciate as much of your feedback as possible. Thanks.
1) The Republicans and their friendly independents came out strong. They were highly motivated after having lost the last two elections. Our rank and file were simply less motivated. 2) The Republicans "tag-teamed" us. They ran in a very united fashion urging people to "vote for the Republican team" in order to "reform Augusta." It was an effective strategy that resulted in their people voting for party over the individual therefore blunting the usual "all politics is local" norm. 3) The Republicans targeted key races and poured in lots of cash from both inside and outside the state. This was very visible in Joe Perry's state senate race, for example. Also, in that race and no doubt others, they worked the ground very hard all summer long and through the fall right to election day. 4) The Republicans had message discipline up and down the state: "Augusta is broken. Dems are the status quo. We will reform Augusta and bring jobs to Maine." Very clear, very strong, very consistent, very effective. They defined this election, themed it well, and it worked. (Our statewide messaging was far less coordinated and much more muddled. i.e. Why did we not stage a uniform attack on their radical tea party platform? We simply did not define and theme this election well on a statewide basis. We can't just rely on GOTV. We have to do persuasion. They did this well. We didn't. **Also, the endgame anti-Cutler mailings were BAD and made us look silly and desperate. What a fiasco that was.) 5) This, again, was a mid-term election where the minority party usually makes gains. Add to that a sense of frustration with state government and huge frustration due to the recession. All together and you had a perfect storm for something like this. (However, I will say that perhaps our state party should have been better attuned to these forecasts and done more to prepare for them. It reminds me of the Scott Brown election in MA.) THE GOOD NEWS: 1) We did score some key wins at all levels of government. 2) We have a lot to learn from this loss, and we need to learn it. That will be a great opportunity so we can re-calibrate. 3) We don't have the numbers yet, but our GOTV efforts may well have turned out at least a typical number of Dems for a mid-term cycle which would mean we had a pretty good turn-out operation in a tough environment. It seems that was the case in Brewer. (It appears that the other side just did this better.) 4) OVERALL, MAINE REMAINS A MODERATE TO PROGRESSIVE STATE. This one election does not mean Maine has suddenly fallen massively in love with the Republicans. Their new legislative majority margins are quite narrow. Eliot Cutler surged to nearly beat LePage in one of the closest governor's elections we've had, holding LePage to just 38% of the vote. That is no statewide mandate for him at all. (If we were a run-off state, Cutler WOULD beat LePage.) The bonds passed, one overwhelmingly. Chellie Pingree destroyed her TeaBagger opponent in southern Maine, and Mike Michaud won handily. 5) Now the R's have to actually GOVERN. It is one thing to win an election and another thing to get some things done. They claim they are going to be great reformers. Well, let's see how well Mainers like their brand of "reform." If they decide to govern as TeaBaggers, they'll get pounded next time around. They may no matter how they decide to govern. And some interesting divisions may emerge in their ranks between the TeaBagger types and the more moderate old school R's. LePage's performance will be most interesting to watch. He and the R's owe payback to the TeaBaggers, the Maine Heritage Policy Center radicals, and their corporate friends. We'll see how they act and what they do. Then we'll see if Mainers like it. It is going to be very, very interesting over the next two years. If they go right-wing or nearly right-wing, Dems, next time, will have a great opportunity to DEFINE THEM. 6) Finally, this is a great opportunity to take a good long hard look at our state party operation. Why should it be based so centrally out of Portland? Do we have the right people in both the elected and paid leadership positions? We need to reflect honestly and make changes as needed if we are going to re-group the way we should and be more effective in 2012.
|