Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

City to require video surveillance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Maryland Donate to DU
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:36 AM
Original message
City to require video surveillance
Source: Baltimore Sun

Cameras to be mandated in new developments, per ordinance just passed.

Hoping to deter crime by expanding the use of surveillance cameras, Aberdeen passed a measure that empowers the city government and police to require cameras in new developments.

The Police Department, the Department of Planning and Community Development, and the Department of Public Works will decide whether a new residential, commercial or industrial development must install cameras at "strategic locations" before a development permit is issued.

The City Council passed the measure, which becomes effective next week, by a 4-1 vote.




Read more: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/harford/bal-ha.camera07oct07,0,1394895.story



The ordinance
Aberdeen Ordinance No. 731-06: Surveillance Cameras:

Provisions for security cameras shall be installed at strategic locations in all commercial and industrial developments and in any residential developments deemed appropriate by the Aberdeen Police Department and Department of Planning and Community Development. Coordination between the Aberdeen Police Department, Department of Public Works and the property owner will be required prior to the approval of any development permits.


Cameras installed at new developments will be connected to a watch room at the police station, Mayor S. Fred Simmons said.

Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. 1984 Coming Soon to a city near you
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Can't get upset about moves like this
as they tend to be a big waste of money.

After about the 10,000 time they send a patrol car out to investigate something that looks suspicious and turns out to be nothing, they ignore the camera and go back to responding to people who need help. Like it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sure the police, dept of planning and public works are competent
to determine whether cameras are necessary.

:sarcasm:

Who will be on the receiving end of payoffs for the requirement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Maryland Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC