(snip)
They worry that residents - concerned about their pet's safety - will now be able to pay someone to kill a coyote for just passing through their yards. They say that making it easier for more people to kill coyotes will not help reduce the state's coyote population, roughly 10,000 strong, and may make matters worse.
Coyotes are adaptable, opportunistic animals, interested in the easy meals that suburban living often provides and in protecting their territory, according to biologists. When a coyote goes down, a new coyote will inevitably move into the area. With more open land at its disposal, a coyote may even breed more.
But what troubles Jonathan Way most is the apparent blood thirst that some people have for the coyote. Way, author of "Suburban Howls: Tracking the Eastern Coyote in Urban Mas sachusetts," said the state does not have a coyote problem, but rather a "people problem," and the new state regulations will not change that.
"I feel they're completely unnecessary and completely just catering to the hunting community - and to a minority of people who would specifically hunt coyotes at that," Way said. "And to me, it's just fascinating that supposedly one of the most liberal states in the country can make it easier to kill this social animal, this social wild dog."
(snip)
(snip)
Thomas O'Shea, assistant director for wildlife at the state Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, said the division extended the hunting season, now set to begin Oct. 13, to
appease hunters, who have become more interested in killing coyotes in recent years.
(snip)
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/09/09/fair_game/I really have nothing against hunting. I learned a lot from hunters I knew growing up and many that I know are responsible, reasonable and thoughtful about the animals and overall ecology. But why are we 'appeasing hunters'? Why appease any group in the face of facts that should indicate we should Not appease them?