|
The Cadillac and the Drapes didn't help his image, but I considered those issues to be minor. Still, some voters believe to this day that the state paid for the drapes and the Caddy, which is not true. Patrick paid for them with his own money.
Lobbying Bob Rubin at Citibank on behalf of his former employers at Ameriquest was more problematic. Citibank does some business with the state, and this lobbying could be interpreted by some as attempting strong arm tactics. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on this and call it a lapse in judgment, but others aren't so charitable.
He has also had difficulties dealing with the Legislature. The Speaker and the Senate President wield a lot of power in their respective chambers, and their agendas are different than his.
My main complaint with him is that he seems to have forgotten how he got there. In his election campaign, he built the largest grassroots movement in the history of the state. The Boston Globe cited that in its endorsement of him, saying that the grassroots organization should help him to govern more effectively. But he hasn't made effective use of that. Witness the recent budget debate in the House. When he learned that the Speaker was looking to raise the sales tax, rather than the gasoline tax, (which Patrick felt was the better option), he wrote a letter to the House and Senate promising to veto that bill, but didn't call on his supporters to call or write against that measure. A few hundred calls might have made a difference to some reps.
I still plan to support him next year, but I don't know how many others feel the same way.
|