On the front page of the Sunday Strib:
Is Another Election the Answer?
http://www.startribune.com/politics/state/40901272.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUTThe answer to the GOP's prayers, perhaps, but that's about it. State law makes absolutely no provision for a do-over. Careful reading of the article makes it clear that Norm's only path to a revote would be to tie the matter up in court for so long that a desperate MN legislature might
draft and pass a new law calling for a re-vote just to finally restore Minnesota's full representation in the Senate.
And what are the chances of that happening?
"About the same chance as me winning the lottery," said David Schultz, a professor at Hamline University who specializes in election law.
So why the misleading headline? Why do they want to give casual readers the impression that a re-vote might be in the wind?
We've been seeing this sort of slant to the news ever since the Strib was purchased by an investment firm. I've been closely following the news on Norm's court challenge for six weeks. Over and over again, the Strib prominently features talking points issued by the Coleman team, while downplaying the cold, hard facts. I think this newspaper is working to actually influence the course of events, rather than merely report them.