"They wouldn't let me in the ropes holding this sign," said Jeff Kerr, 34, of Roseville.
His sign read
"HR 676" in big red letters. The bill in question was introduced in 2007 and aimed to establish a national insurance program. It was co-sponsored by Ellison.
Shari Sebastian, also of Roseville, was upset about having to sign a
pledge of support in order to get in.
"You had to stand as a protester if you didn't support the Obama plan," said Sebastian, a 50-year-old political independent. "People over here are made to look like they don't support reform."
http://www.twincities.com/ci_13187219?IADID=Search-www.twincities.com-www.twincities.com(Emphasis mine.)
So, anybody that wasn't 100% gung-ho on the Obama plan was considered a "protester" and lumped in with the anti-reform people. That's a great way to make it appear that all these people are opposed to any sort of health care reform whatsoever, rather than being pro-reform but just against the Obama plan. Of course, upping the numbers of the anti-reformers will ultimately help pave the way for a "bi-partisan" solution which will be a handout to insurance companies that once again reams the poor and working class. Rest assured that your elected representatives are working hard to protect the interests of the almighty insurance companies. Nothing new there.
Then again, I guess it's only fair. After all, the war profiteers have been raking it in for years. Last fall, it was Wall Street's turn for a payout. This time around, it's the insurance companies that get to step up and feed at the public trough. Ain't America grand?
And WTF is with the "pledge of support" they were making people sign. Sounds a lot like the Bush "loyalty oath."
The more things change, the more they stay the same.