If there is a prolonged recount with litigation (an election contest trial) as occured in the 2008-2009 infamous Al Frankin - Norm Coleman Senate recount, then there could be several months beginning when the legislature convenes in January where Pawlenty and the Republican-majority legislature (in both houses) will be legislating away.
They were discussing this on Nancy Nelson show yesterday afternoon (around 540p 11/3) and now it shows up in the Star Tribune this morning (11/4), "No decision in Minn. gov race means Dems lose":
http://www.startribune.com/local/106609198.html"Democrats fear that Republicans newly in charge of both chambers will combine with Pawlenty to push through massive spending cuts and pursue long-held goals on things like gay marriage, photo ID for voters and expanded gambling." (also mentioned: legislative and congressional district line redrawing, and accepting $1 billion federal money tied to the health care law.)
"The 0.42% margin will trigger a recount unless the official canvass Nov. 23 pushes Dayton's lead past half a percentage point."
"County canvassing boards will review results and report to the state canvassing board on Nov. 23. If the margin after the board meets is less than half a percentage point, it would trigger an automatic recount at taxpayers' expense. If the margin exceeds that percentage, the losing candidate could request a recount but would have to pay for it."
=================================
Note that only 500 votes shifted in the Frankin-Coleman Senate recount. Whereas Emmer would have to overcome an 8,854 vote deficit in order to win. So its not likely that he will prevail in the end. But who knows how long they can gum up the works with litigation during which time Pawlenty would continue to govern, with a Republican legislature ...
Interestingly, I see the AM 950 ad saturation campaign by the Green Party and by Ken Pentel, and funded by who knows who -- taking a combined 12,330 votes -- worked: if only 1,680 of those votes would have otherwise gone to Dayton, then his margin would have been greater than 0.5%, thus avoiding the automatic recount).