Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reporters, with bias, cannot comprehend what is told to them so they make stuff up.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 09:18 AM
Original message
Reporters, with bias, cannot comprehend what is told to them so they make stuff up.
"Tornado assault baffles scientists"
http://www.startribune.com/premium/122777454.html

Article by: BILL McAULIFFE , Star Tribune
Updated: May 28, 2011 - 10:33 PM

Urban touchdowns and a stubborn jet stream only partly explain unusually high death tolls.

Global warming has been taking blame. Some of the variables behind the tornado outbreak -- such as the unusual springtime warmth of the Gulf of Mexico -- are considered to be directly tied to global warming. But other key connections to a warming atmosphere are missing, making the interactions that have produced the storms more difficult to decipher.

The simplest and perhaps least satisfying explanation -- random chance.
==============================================
Usually when my kids behaved like this I ended the discussion by saying "Because I said so". Most kids grow up and develop some listening, comprehension skills but today's reporters, in my opinion, appear to be stuck at 4th grade comprehension. levels.
Our family example of this was my younger cousin who in 4th grade would not believe that chickens were not baby turkeys and was prepared to stand her ground against the encyclopedia's information.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is the reporter making up?
Edited on Sun May-29-11 01:04 PM by Brickbat
I don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The headline. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Reporters generally don't write their own headlines.
I can't read the rest of the article, because I don't have access, but it seems to me that the head isn't wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Duh!
Edited on Mon May-30-11 06:28 PM by kickysnana
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If you can no longer see the problem, you are part of the problem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mascarax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-29-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Tornado assault baffles scientists"
I saw the headline this morning at the grocery store.
I thought it was the "Weekly World News"! But they're defunct...just the Strib. How far they have fallen.

Best part was it looked very sinister...white text on black background.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. On tonight's 10 o'clock news (WCCO)
Mike Fairbourne said he didn't know if there was enough evidence to really connect all the tornados and climate change (though I believe he used the term "global warming") - his tone seemed to "pooh-pooh" the whole idea.

If I'm not mistaken, Fairbourne has always been a conservative. Many years ago he got himself in some trouble for getting active with the anti-choice crowd. At the time 'CCO did not consider it appropriate for someone who was on its newscasts to become active in such a controversial cause - even if all he did was read the the weather reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mascarax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Fairbourne is a Denier
I think he got unwanted PR a few years ago because he was outed on a list of "scientists" who denied climate change. Of course, he degenerated into babbling about "squishy science" and GOP talking points. And the list turned out not to be scientists, really. Can't remember if this was the same list that some real scientist names were on and they asked to be taken off because they hadn't signed it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC