|
A local newspaper's columnist found it cute to say that because Bingaman did not vote to confirm Miguel Estrada or Alberto Gonzales he was unsupportive of Hispanics and we (Hispanics) should remember this when he runs in 06. I did not want to let him get away with it so I wrote a reply which was published in full. Thought I would share it with you guys b/c it is not available online and you guys can take bits of it and send it somewhere in the future if they try the same smear campaign on Senator Bingaman....
John Dendahl’s column of February 18th, 2005 criticizes Senator Jeff Bingaman and other Senate Democrats for what he calls “loving Latinos…so long as they remain Democrat…and show up as Republican nominess for influential positions”. Bingaman has consistently supported the Latino community and opposed nominating Alberto Gonzales and Miguel Estrada due to questionable segments in their career.
Mr. Dendahl maintains a right wing, unsupported argument addressing one perspective. He cites the failure of Senator Bingaman’s vote to approve Miguel Estrada and Alberto Gonzales to important judicial nominations as his reasoning that Senator Bingaman does not support Latino political upward mobility. Estrada and Gonzales are intelligent Latino’s with great personal stories of immigration, cultural barriers, and professional success. When Democratic President Bill Clinton appointed judicial nominees Jorge Rangel, Christine Arguello and Enrique Moreno and their confirmations were supported by Bingaman but stonewalled by Senate Republicans where was this in Mr. Dendahl’s letter?
Mr. Dendahl’s lacks research, characteristic of a right winger. Estrada was only 41 when he withdrew his nomination for the important United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, after a Democratic filibuster. Estrada previously served as a Supreme Court Clerk and in the solicitor general’s office. Upon hearings for his confirmation, Estrada refused to answer tough questions that Senators asked because he had no judicial decisions for them to review. With a lifetime appointment, it is essential for Senators to ask tough questions and not appoint an ideological judge. Bingaman voted him down because he refused to answer any questions on his positions.
Mr. Dendahl must have a short memory that undermines critical aspects of Gonzalez’s career. Last year the horrible Abu Ghraib scandal showed American soldiers torturing Iraqi prisoners in various fashions. Amongst them with dogs threatening bound prisoners, prisoners stacked nude in a pyramid, and bound prisoners beaten while US soldiers gave one big smile. As White House counsel, Mr. Gonzalez was a chief advocate for an argument of the Geneva Conventions treatment of prisoners did not apply to the current situation in Iraq. Amazingly, Gonzales refused to answer what constituted torture in his Senate hearings. As Attorney General of the United States, we deserve better than people who advocate torture. That is why Senator Bingaman opposed his nomination, not because he was Latino and conservative.
My Name
|