http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/07/opinion/l07pill.htmlContraception Pill, Vetoed
Published: August 7, 2005
To the Editor:
Gov. George E. Pataki's reasons for vetoing emergency contraception legislation (front page, Aug. 1) are medically unfounded and simply untrue.
A spokesman for Mr. Pataki said this bill "provides no protection whatsoever" for young women, when in fact the bill would protect young women's health and safety. As a pediatrician, I know that emergency contraception is a safe and effective way to prevent unintended pregnancies and promote young women's health.
I have seen firsthand that a majority of young patients do include their parents in their reproductive health decisions, and there is no evidence to imply that this bill would change that. In six major scientific studies, the evidence shows that adolescents use emergency contraception correctly, and without an increase in risky behavior.
If we focus on the science and not on politics, it is clear that increased access to emergency contraception is in the best interest of New York's women. In deciding to veto this important legislation, Mr. Pataki is endangering young women, not protecting them.
Richard H. Sills, M.D.
Albany, Aug. 1, 2005
The writer is a member of Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health.