Ellsworth, the B-1B base in South Dakota, is slotted for closure. This detail is both political and scary.
It's political because of the Tom Daschle defeat last year. The guy who beat him, Thune (R - Rat bastard) PROMISED he'd protect the base during this year's BRAC. He narrowly beat Daschle, and all the Repugnicans were rejoicing in how big a victory it was to have the Senate Minority leader voted out of office.
So, even if Thune gets Ellsworth AFB removed from the list the damage is done. But
WE have to rub it in. Anyone who has a web site, or calls into a show about BRAC, or engages in water-cooler jabber about it shoudl keep it in mind. We have to pound this point in -
the Senator with the "important" victory over Daschle can't even secure his state's biggest military asset. Now for the scary part. Ellsworth is only one of two bases used for the B-1B bomber (the other is Dyess in Texas). Hence, the DOD is willing to place all its B-1B eggs in one basket. The B-52, on the other hand, a beast nearly a half century older than the B-1B, isn't being touched by the BRAC. Both B-52 bases (Barksdale, LA, and Minot, ND) are to remain intact.
Why is this scary? Well, according to the START II treaty, the B-1B can not carry nuclear weapons. (
http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=jf99norris) But the B-52 can.
So, Rumsfeld et al would apparently rather keep a 50-year old nuclear-capable dinosaur around and downsize our fleet of the much more modern, but non-nuclear, B-1B. We can all draw our own conclusions from that.
According to "The Book 2005 Airman Magazine" we currently have 93 B-52s in the Active and Reserve Air Force. The same publication says we have 67 B-1B's.