Barack's Been Consistently Against The War? Maybe Not?

[Danzo]

There's a bill in the Senate to bring to bring our troops home. And Barack ISN'T one of the co-sponsors. I'm not sure the he's "he's too busy campaigning" excuse is going to fly, either, since Hillary Clinton found time to be a co-sponsor of the bill. See for yourself:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN02633:@@@P

[OhioBlue]

1. Well, the heck you say!!!

Holy crap. i've changed my mind. I'm gonna go right now and early vote for Hillary.

oh wait, nothing has changed. She is still too polarizing, she's run a horrible campaign and she is still too entrenched in D.C. Barack is still the better candidate, will build the Party, approach things in a way that will actually lead to results, isn't tainted by years of insider politics, etc.

whew - that was close tho. you almost got me.

[Danzo]

2. If You Don't Like My Posts, Blame the Obama Fans

If they didn't make these false statements like "(Obama has against the war all along)," there would be no NEED for me to come here and set the record straight.

[Kukesa]

3. That must be a heavy burden on your shoulders . . .

"to come here and set the record straight."

Are we supposed to be impressed, or what?

:eyes:

[Danzo]

4. Facts!

That's all I'm providing. Facts that seem very relevant to Barack's presidential candidacy.

What's wrong with that?

[IowaGirl]

5. Facts are good!!

Thank you. :pals:

[Kukesa]

6. Oh, no. Not another one. Go to bed; it's a school night. n/t