(Denise reports for Cleveland Scene, great in-depth articles)
http://blogs.clevescene.com/cnotes/2008/05/pajamagate_do_we_really_wanna.php
Pajamagate: Do we really wanna impeach the best attorney general Ohio's had in a long time?
Governor Ted Strickland is certainly making a statement by demanding the immediate impeachment of Attorney General Marc Dann.
....
While it took the Taft administration over six years and $50 million to finally shine a light on its own indiscretions – neatly packaged as “Coingate” – Strickland is smart to take immediate action concerning his own party’s scandal.
However, one has to wonder if calling for Dann’s impeachment isn’t a bit hasty. After all, it’s unclear if there’s even grounds to impeach a public officeholder simply on the fact that he had a perfectly legal, albeit distasteful, affair with a consenting adult. Even Republican House Speaker Jon Husted has noted that it would be a grave mistake to impeach Dann, because it would set a hasty and problematic precedent for the future impeachment of other state officials, according to the Associated Press.
Upon some reflection, here is my problem with Dann resigning - "better the devil you know than the devil you don't".
As someone else pointed out, Subodh is not likely to be the replacement since he is working on Barack's campaign. Dann's replacement could be someone as inept as Petros or Montgomery, and that would be worse than having Dann continue.
After reading Denise's blog, I am a bit conflicted...