Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Protest RACIST Bill Bennett in Cincinnati next Tuesday!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:36 PM
Original message
Protest RACIST Bill Bennett in Cincinnati next Tuesday!
don't let him play the victim. don't let him wiggle out of his blatant racism-the central argument of his point was that 'blacks commit more crimes' whether he really wants to abort black babies or not-he still at the least, made that slur

info on his event-please forward to ohio dems
http://www.ucrepublicans.com/bennett.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's a sign.
'blacks commit more crimes'
WANT TO BET?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, his point was that they had a higher crime rate.
This isn't a controversial statement, and is far from a novel utterance. And it's different from what you wrote.

The original research was to understand the relationship between poverty and crime rates. Only after incorporating geographic isolation (segregation), crappy education rates, and unemployment did the correlation firm up nicely. This led to policies (in the late '90s) to work at breaking up this persistent bundling of properties, and provided an explanation as to why single-issue approaches had usually failed.

It was quickly pointed out that those in such communities also had higher abortion rates; and that the increase in abortion rates correlated with the decrease in crime rates in those communities. This, a pro-choice argument when put forward, was a fairly straightforward implication.

It can be spun in a racist manner; it's unclear Bennett did so, if you read his comments in context. But that doesn't diminish the usefulness of the research, or the fact that those producing it were motivating highly progressive policies. Let's not banish everything that can be abused: included in the list would be fire and wells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. spun in a racist manner?
I don't think it's unclear at all what Bennett said, and it was a clearly racist statement:

Addressing a caller's suggestion that the "lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30 years" would be enough to preserve Social Security's solvency, radio host and former Reagan administration Secretary of Education Bill Bennett dismissed such "far-reaching, extensive extrapolations" by declaring that if "you wanted to reduce crime ... if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down." Bennett conceded that aborting all African-American babies "would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do," then added again, "but the crime rate would go down

http://mediamatters.org/items/200509280006


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Quote not a mangled retelling of what he said,
but what he said. The closer you get to the original source, the more reliable your interpretation is likely to be, the less filtered your thinking will be. Even the NYT managed to quote more of what Bennett actually said, without adding words.

But the piecemeal quotes manages to point out that first and foremost it was a "far-reaching ... extrapolation"; it doesn't point out his attitude, except to say he 'dismissed' it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Exactly
It's like saying, "Not that I would necessarily approve of this, or endorse it, or anything, BUT..."

He said it. He just should have kept his big mouth shut. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. looks like he chickened out-
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:42 PM by Algorem
http://www.cleveland.com/newsflash/cleveland/index.ssf?/base/news-19/1128348241200061.xml&storylist=cleveland

Outcry prompts former education secretary to delay appearance

10/3/2005, 9:56 a.m. ET
The Associated Press

CINCINNATI (AP) — Former Education Secretary William Bennett has postponed an appearance at the University of Cincinnati because of what he called a "willful distortion" of his remarks about aborting black babies.

Bennett said controversy stemming from his "Morning in America" radio show last week would detract from serious discussions of issues. College Democrats at the university had said they would protest Tuesday's scheduled appearance.

"The current controversy that has arisen around comments I made on my radio show, based on a willful distortion of what I said, will take away from the serious discussion I wanted to engage in with the students and community at the University of Cincinnati," Bennett said in a statement released Sunday by the UC College Republicans.

While answering a caller's question, the author of "The Book of Virtues" took issue with the hypothesis put forth in a recent book that one reason crime is down is that abortion is up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Ohio Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC