Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Casey's rotten stem cell vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Pennsylvania Donate to DU
 
bcoylepa Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 10:43 AM
Original message
Casey's rotten stem cell vote
why a man who supports emergency contraception cannot get behind embryonic stem cell research is beyond me
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/11/AR2007041101736.html?hpid=topnews

For the second time in nine months, the Senate today passed a bill that would loosen President Bush's restrictions on human embryonic stem cell research, but once again falling short of the 67 votes needed to override a promised veto.

The Senate voted 63 to 34 to pass the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act, which would allow federally funded studies of stem cells isolated from embryos slated for destruction at fertility clinics. Read more..

Bob Casey (D-PA)voted against. The final vote was 63 YEA with three Democratic Senators not voting, which means we need only one NAY defector..
from Crooks and Liars

Is Bob Casey in hiding??? He should be after this vote
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I knew it wouldn't be long before he disappointed us.
The only difference between him and Santorum is that Casey is a nice man. He don't necessarily need a nice Senator, we need one that represents his constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep
He didn't represent me with that vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Bull-fucking-shit
Are you really this stupid? It was one vote. You may not have liked it but everything Sanitarium did was bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. This was not unexpected but I still rather have Casey in there than Santorum
Anyhow, I still think Casey is going to run for governor in 2010.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bcoylepa Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. no to pro-life governor
would rather have him in the senate than give him free reign as governor on choice issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm the same exact way - which is why I campaigned for Rendell in 2002
As long as Casey is NOT on the judiciary committee, he can do very little harm to the pro-choice movement. But if he were governor and somehow RoeVWade was overturned, he could have a major impact in Pennsylvania
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-17-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please send Senator Casey an email telling him how you feel about his Stem Cell Vote.
http://casey.senate.gov/contact.cfm

Here is a copy of what I sent him.

I am very disappointed in your stem cell research vote. We needed you vote to help override President Bush's veto. I think you need to remember this state voted out Rick Santorum. If you are going to vote the way he did, then we all wasted our effort. Stem Cell Research is very important. It can save lives. The embryos just get thrown away anyway. I don't understand why you would not want a life to be saved by something that is just thrown away. I know that you’re catholic. I am catholic too. I do not believe a good politician allows their faith to legislate for them. There is a tall distinguished, very intelligent man from Massachusetts, in the Senate, who could explain this to you. Maybe you should invite him out for a cup of coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I sent an email and called his office
Doubt if it will change his vote. I'll be really ticked if his vote costs us an override of the veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Pennsylvania Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC