Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Casey votes FOR Bush's domestic spying demands. (8/03/07)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Pennsylvania Donate to DU
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 06:51 AM
Original message
Bob Casey votes FOR Bush's domestic spying demands. (8/03/07)
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8/4/04858/29657

Senate Gives in on Wiretapping. 16 Dems Go Along.
by Meteor Blades
Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 10:00:24 PM PDT

The Senate has surrendered to Mister Bush on domestic spying, yielding ignominiously to the White House’s demands that the unitary executive be given more authority when it seeks to wiretap suspected terrorists without warrants. The vote was 60-28. If passed by the House, the bill would be law for six months. Meanwhile, Congress would use that time to put together a permanent one.

The New York Times notes:

The White House and Congressional Republicans hailed the Senate vote as critical to plugging what they saw as dangerous gaps in the intelligence agencies’ ability to detect terrorist threats.

"I can sleep a little safer tonight," Senator Christopher S. Bond, the Missouri Republican who co-sponsored the measure, declared after the Senate vote.

The measure approved by the Senate expires in six months and would have to be re-authorized. The White House’s grudging agreement to make it temporary helped to attract the votes of some moderate Democrats who said they thought it was important for Congress to approve some version of the wiretapping bill before its recess.

The White House and Republican leaders pressed the point throughout the day that a vote against the measure would put the nation at greater risk of attack.

No Republicans voted against the bill. The following Democrats voted for it: Evan Bayh (Indiana); Tom Carper (Delaware); Bob Casey (Pennsylvania); Kent Conrad (North Dakota); Dianne Feinstein (California); Daniel Inouye (Hawai‘i); Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota); Nancy Mary Landrieu (Louisiana); Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas); Claire McCaskill (Missouri); Barbara Mikulski (Maryland); Bill Nelson (Florida); Ben Nelson (Nebraska); Mark Pryor (Arkansas); Ken Salazar (Colorado); Jim Webb (Virginia).

snip>
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. another reason I am glad I voted my conscience in the primary
I am quite sure that Pennachio would never have voted this way...and that provides me with the ounce of solace I need when I have to hear this shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm bginning to wonder
if we have a party or are we just another group to bow to the republicon rule. START GROWING A PAIR OR FIND YOURSELVES VOTED OUT. THE PEOPLE NEED REPRESENTATIVES TO DO ON OUR BEHALF AND NOT THE REPUBLICON PARTY!!!! Casey should know better and i will not vote for him in the future as his nose is browned with republicon crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kaybea Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, I'm wondering what was the point of voting for this guy
in the general. So he caucuses with the Dems, big deal so far..what's the benefit if he votes increasingly with Republicans? He votes against stem cell research last week (or was it month?) and now votes for spying, overseen by an AG who has appeared before the Senate but either can't remember what he's done or lies about it....so he's either incompetent or criminal! Casey got where he is on the name of his father...sound familiar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Were you disappointed with his vote on the minimum wage?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-03-07 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's a switch tactic I'd expect from that other party.
If you think voting for minimum wage justifies voting for spying on the constituents he's supposed to serve, think again. That's equal to saying he loves and kisses babies while he's spitting up on me. Thanks, but no thanks, as we can get others who will not only vote for things like minimum wage, but will keep our constitutional rights at the same time. It is part of his job to do this for us and when you don't do your job, you need fired. Most of that other party does need to be fired and put into jail for treason and other crimes against the usa and its citizens. I feel no sorrow for anybody claiming to be a democrat that not only falls for republicon ways, but violates my rights too to kiss and benefit the ass(es) of who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Once Santorum seemed unbeatable...
so the party's bosses made an early choice of Casey as the most electable, the well-connected son of a former state governor.

As it turned out, the winds changed, and Santorum became a sure loser. But we are stuck with Casey, the safe choice.

We always knew that he would not vote for abortion. But up until the vote on FISA I thought he functioned adequately on a Democratic team with widely-divergent philosophies. But with the FISA vote, he moves into Santorum territory.

Santorum territory is where I (and probably others) start to wonder who can beat him in 2012.

Casey is not a commanding public speaker, so he can be beaten in debate.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. No chance
And I'm not just saying this optimistically. You have very little chance of beating a sitting US Senator in a primary. I can personally guarantee you Bucks would not go against him. Lehigh, Carbon counties...yeah, almost no shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So how can we get the message to Casey not to cave in to Bush
on constitutional issues?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Write him, call him
Same as anyone else. I don't like his vote and neither does Patrick Murphy BTW but I won't toss him out for something that's up in 6 months and even if I wanted to the logistics are tough. Write letters to the editor. Same way you influence anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Here's Senator Casey's response regarding his "yea" vote on the FISA bill:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FREEWILL56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. This sounds like he's trying a bit of fence sitting to me.
Edited on Fri Aug-10-07 12:27 AM by FREEWILL56
Yes, kissing the republicon butts while sending a smoke screen of I'm trying to figure it all out so it's ok for spying on us at this time? What's this about fixing as he voted to keep our constitutional rights broken?
“I voted for both versions of the temporary FISA fix in order to ensure that U.S. intelligence has the tools they need to target terrorists while a larger review of the FISA law is conducted."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Who cares if he can be beaten in a debate?
Most voters don't watch debates, especiallty non-presidential ones. Santorum is certainly a much better debater than Casey, but he lost to Casey by 59%-41%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sandrakae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. Bob Casey is Rick Santorum in disguise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Pennsylvania Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC