Pennsylvania’s top environmental official says the state will use tough enforcement when it comes to regulating natural gas drilling and that much of the opposition to drilling is
“not based on science or fact.” (emphasis mine)
Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Michael Krancer told a natural gas industry conference in Philadelphia on Thursday much of the opposition is “ideologically based” and “not based on science or fact.” Krancer says Pennsylvania has the model program for oversight in the industry.
Krancer spoke to the Shale Gas Insight conference in place of Gov. Tom Corbett, a first-term Republican who had to cancel at the last-minute because of dangerous flooding conditions in parts of the state.
Activist groups protesting the conference say drilling is tainting wells and causing a public health hazard.
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/apbreak11/AP-gasdrilling-2011-09-08I was really hoping that things would change for the better once John Hanger left the PA DEP. It would appear that is not going to happen judging from inane remarks such as this one by Krancer.
WTF does he mean that those of us opposed to the wanton destruction of PA by the frackers aren't using science or fact backed rationale. There is plenty of science based evidence that this "clean energy" method is causing a lot of harm to the people, environment, animals, water supplies...etc of PA.
It really appears that the ANGA, API and the other fossil fuel parasites got the most from their $1,000,000 plus contributions to Corbett and his friends.
Ask the people in the Dimock area or the Washington county area or just about any area where fracking is taking place whether Krancer has his "facts" right. This ***hole seems to be right in step with Hanger who was generally regarded as the worst thing to ever happen to the PA DEP.
Hey Krancer...here are some facts that might interest you.
from Public Citizen citizen.org
"Exempts from the Safe Drinking Water Act a coalbed methane drilling technique called “hydraulic fracturing,” a potential polluter of underground drinking water. One of the largest companies employing this technique is Halliburton, for which Vice President Richard Cheney acted as chief executive officer in the 1990s. This exemption would kill lawsuits by Western ranchers who say that drilling for methane gas pollutes groundwater by injecting contaminated fluids underground. Only 16 companies stand to significantly benefit from this exemption from clean water laws: Anadarko, BP, Burlington Resources, ChevronTexaco, ConocoPhillips, Devon Energy, Dominion Resources, EOG Resources, Evergreen Resources, Halliburton, Marathon Oil, Oxbow (Gunnison Energy), Tom Brown, Western Gas Resources, Williams Cos and XTO. These companies gave nearly $15 million to federal candidates—with more than three-quarters of that total going to Republicans. Moreover, the 16 companies spent more than $70 million lobbying Congress.
More here:
http://www.marcellus-shale.us/2005-Energy-Act.htmFrom Donnan.com
<snip>
While natural gas may burn clean, it certainly isn't clean to extract. It's even been said that gas in shale requires more energy to extract than the gas will eventually produce. It takes hundreds of tanker loads to haul the one or two million gallons of water required for a single fracking. Then a large percentage of it has to be trucked back to a treatment plant. Fuel for trucks, generators, drill rigs and every other piece of equipment you can imagine. "Clean" energy???
Lots more here:
http://www.donnan.com/Marcellus-Gas_Hickory.htmor here:
http://www.gaslandthemovie.com/whats-fracking/also:
http://www.splitestate.com/http://palwv.org/issues/marcellusshale/Frac%20Action.pdfhttp://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10159/1063980-455.stmhttp://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/04/prweb5268984.htmWhen you look at the players involved in this industrial pillaging, why the hell should we trust people like Cheney or companies like Halliburton and Enron?