|
Excerpts of minutes of the committee meeting on this bill:
Mundy said that the bill had the "lowest tax rate- one percent - of any bill we've seen." She explained that the revenue from the average well would be over 16 million over the life of the well, while the revenue obtained from the state would be $160,000 to pay for the impact fees. Mundy criticized the lack of a statewide fee in the bill and the fact that it imposed administrative duties on the local counties and municipalities in order to collect the impact fee.
Mundy said that "the bill strips from local governments, what little power they do have to control the siting of the wells," and added that "this is a key problem for local governments who want to keep drill pads out of residential areas or protect areas that should be off limits to drilling." Chairman Mundy called the measure the "drill, baby, drill" bill and told Chairman Benninghoff that "true to your party platform, you have managed to benefit the industry while providing the least possible benefit to Pennsylvania citizens to protect their land, their water, their air, and their property values."
Chairman Mundy opined the legislation grants "extraordinary powers" to the secretary of DCNR, and asked for clarification on the language used specifically the section granting the secretary the authority "to determine, in the secretary's discretion, the need for, and the location of, any project authorized by this chapter; to acquire in the name of the commonwealth, by purchase, condemnation, or otherwise, such lands as may be needed." Chairman Mundy questioned whether this could be construed in such a way to include eminent domain or forced pooling. Rep. Ellis responded that the language in the bill was already current law and the portion that the Chairman had read beginning "to acquire in the name of the commonwealth," applied only in regards to the oil and gas companies, which is also currently in law.
Chairman Evankovich commented that the oil and gas lease currently in law was rewritten into House Bill 1950. Chairman Mundy next wanted to know if the bill gave the power of eminent domain or forced pooling to any secretary, company or industry. Rep. Ellis responded, "absolutely not."
Mundy then questioned the preemption of local ordinances found within the legislation. Rep. Ellis responded that there are statewide safety standards put in place by the legislation and the goal is to "create an environment that provided protection for the municipalities to be able to operate." Mundy commented that the bill "appears to take away what little control the municipalities have over ordinances," and questioned how this would confer more power or standards to local municipalities. Chairman Benninghoff commented that the legislation would create standards but require that the Department of Environmental Protection consider municipal comments in the process.
Mundy returned to the issue of preemption of local ordinances, reading from the bill; "all local rules, regulations, codes, agreements resolutions, ordinances and other local enactments that regulate oil and gas operations are hereby superseded."
|