John (introduce a federal bill to ban gay marriage) Thune secretly paid bloggers to trash Tom Daschle. And the bloggers used a lot of fake reporter Gannon's/Gukert's fake news stories to do their trashing.
Moreover, the bloggers should be people who are beyond reproach, a history professor, and a lawyer (then a student).
The history professor got like $27,000 for his lies, and the law student only 8K. But, the student then got a job in Thune's office, so no evil deed goes unrewarded.
I wonder where Thune got the money to pay for these ass clowns?
http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2005/02/18/gannon/SNIIP
While promoting Talon and Gannon as credible journalistic sources, Lauck's blog reprinted sensational paragraphs posted by Gannon on the Talon News Web site, urging readers to take special note of the Talon reporter's "quite interesting article" about Daschle's "Sopranos-style" tactics. The story contained no actual evidence of misconduct by either the Democratic senator or the Sioux Falls newspaperman, beyond anonymous quotes that accused them of Mafia-like intimidation of "small business owners" and other beleaguered anti-Daschle dissidents. (The "Sopranos" story, like all of Gannon's other works, has been scrubbed by Talon's Republican owners from their Web site.)
The bloggers promoted dozens of Talon News attacks on Daschle, under the false flag of journalistic independence. They proclaimed themselves the paladins of truth, battling against South Dakota's "liberal media." Nobody in South Dakota would know until months after Nov. 2, when Daschle was so narrowly defeated, that those "independent" bloggers dogging him had been subsidized by the Thune campaign. But there, on the final post-election filings, were the names Lauck and Van Beek, who had been paid $27,000 and $8,000, respectively.
ON EDIT: Fairly decent commentary (about this rightwing smear crap) can be found at this left-leaning south dakota blog:
http://dakotatoday.typepad.com/