|
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 08:37 AM by doeriver

Entries on Wikipedia edited by Davis aide Press secretary also admits deleting info on brother via federal computer http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2007/aug/11/entries-on-wikipedia-edited-bydavis-aide/ By Tom Humphrey Posted August 11, 2007 at midnight
...(more at hyperlink)
Broer said Wikipedia has paid particular attention to submissions from congressional office computers since a “scandal” in 2006 over revisions to biographies of several members of Congress. In general, the revisions would delete negative information, such as broken campaign promises, and replace it with more favorable information.
Davis took office in January. Hill came to Washington with Davis.
Broer said “vandalism” occurs when someone deletes information from a Wikipedia article that has been properly attributed, providing the sources of the statement or documents.
Under Wikipedia procedures, if a person deems a statement unfair or inaccurate, he or she should contact the Web site and present his or her case.
Wade Munday, spokesman for the Tennessee Democratic Party, said the situation “calls the judgment of Congressman Davis and his staff into question about what is the appropriate and inappropriate use of their time as public servants.”
Munday said it would be appropriate for a political campaign, following Wikipedia procedures, to challenge information deemed incorrect on a Web site entry. Many campaigns do so, he said.
But he said it was inappropriate for “a staffer on a federal payroll” and using the U.S. House computer system to do so.
Hill said that, had he understood Wikipedia rules, he would probably have logged in as required and sought to make revisions from his home computer.
When initially contacted about the attempts to revise the Davis and Rep. Hill biographies, Hill told the News Sentinel he was not personally responsible. But he called a reporter back later to say he had spoken off the cuff on his cell phone in the midst of a hectic event involving the congressman and “miscommunicated.”
He had, indeed, made the revisions, Hill said, and “I apologize for the confusion.”

|