Here's one answer to your question; it was written by Garland Stevenson:
Santa Claus and Politics
Do you believe in Santa Claus? By that I mean, do you expect to wake up on Christmas morning and find piles of gifts all around your tree without you or anyone else having done any shopping? Try it sometime and see how happy your children and others are on Christmas morning.
Now, a similar question about political campaigns. Do you think that companies provide political signs, literature, office space, gasoline, motel rooms, and telephone service without charge for political candidates? Do you want candidates who represent your views and will look after you, your family members, and society in general? Do you want elected officials to put the rights and needs of individuals ahead of the interests of corporations?
Everyone I've talked to about politics agrees that candidates shouldn’t rely on large corporations and PACs for their financial needs. People want populist, grassroots politicians who, when elected, are only responsible to ordinary citizens. By the way, those people include EVERYONE. Democrats, Republicans, Green Party members, etc. We the People. That's us. That’s every citizen, visitor, etc.
What other sources are available to candidates? The primary other source is the ordinary citizens that the candidate wants to serve when elected.
In 2004 2,832,704 Texans voted for John Kerry for president.
In 2002 1,819,798 Texans voted for Tony Sanchez for governor.
In 2004 2,817,700 Texans voted for David Van Os for Justice, Supreme Court
In 2002 1,841,359 Texans voted for Kirk Watson for Attorney General.
If every Texan who voted for a Democrat in one of those elections would contribute one dollar ($1.00) to each candidate, it would make a tremendous difference in how campaigns are run. Candidates would be able to use all of their time campaigning and appearing before the public to present their agendas and not spend countless hours trying to raise money just to keep the campaign alive.
THINK ABOUT THAT!
Now comes the hard question. Have you ever contributed money to a political candidate? If so, was it just a token donation, a feel good contribution? Were you thinking that someone else or some organization would take up the slack? I have to tell you this. THERE IS NO POLITICAL SANTA CLAUS.
I think that David Van Os' candidacy for Attorney General is really the key to the outcome of the 2006 elections in Texas. David is the only candidate that I've heard so far that tells it like it is. He's not trying to appease anyone. He steps on toes that need to be stepped on. He has the most thorough knowledge of Texas and United States history of any candidate. If you’ve heard David speak, you've heard solid historical facts about the Office of Texas Attorney General. You've also heard about some of the ways in which Attorneys Generals relate to the federal government.
When other candidates speak, people listen. When David speaks, people get excited. If he is elected, those Democratic candidates to whom people listen will be elected because David got them excited enough to vote.
I don't have access to all of the people on David's e-mail list. If I did, I'd personally send this letter. Since I don't, I've asked David to do so. Please know that I have written this on my own initiative. I know and trust David Van Os to be the person whom I want to represent me in Austin. I hope that you do.
If you haven't made a contribution, please do so. If you can't make a large donation at one time, please make a monthly contribution. It will make a difference. Visit David's website at www.vanosfortexasag.com to see how to contribute.
Over the years, people who worked with and for me heard this statement, "The easiest thing to do about anything is nothing. Don’t do it!"