|
There were two primary candidates, Brett Baldwin and Henry Boehm. Shortly after filing, Boehm makes a public announcement saying he was withdrawing. He doesn't actually file the right forms to withdraw, however. His name stays on the ballot. The primary is held. Surprisingly, Boehm wins 51% to 49% against Baldwin who did virtually no campaigning, assuming either he would win or that Boehm had withdrawn.
Now Boehm has decided to "officially" withdraw. State law says the State Democratic Party Exec. Committee can't appoint someone to fill the place on the ballot (Baldwin included), unless the withdrawing candidate withdraws for a serious medical illness, diagnosed by 2 doctors (not applicable here). Boehm publicly announces he is withdrawing (again) because he doesn't have time and doesn't want the job.
As a result, there will likely be no Democratic candidate on the November ballot for the State Senate. The incumbent, Democrat Ken Armbrister of Victoria, chose not to run for re-election.
Is this a Rovian scenario or what?
|