|
feel the need to vote in favor of tax cuts to please tax-cut-hungry constituents. That’s not what I’m complaining about.
I would not fault Howard or Strama for voting in favor of tax cuts or a popular school financing plan, but that's not what their votes in favor of HB 3 or HB 4 did. Specifically, I do not criticize Howard or Strama (or any of the Craddickhead Quislicrats) for voting in favor of HB 1, which was the property tax relief bill. Virtually everybody voted for HB 1 (the vote was 146-2-1), and so this is not the vote where the Craddickheads parted company with the real Democrats.
Likewise, I do not criticize Howard or Strama for voting against HB 2, which was the allocation of new revenues bill. The Craddickhead Quislicrats voted with the Democrats on HB 2.
I criticize Howard and Strama for their votes IN FAVOR of HB 3, the franchise tax bill, and HB 4, the car sales tax bill. These aren’t tax cutting bills which Howard and Strama needed to support due to their constituents’ preferences for tax cuts (that was HB 1). These are TAX RAISING bills which were championed by Craddick and opposed by Democrats. Howard and Strama actually sided with Craddick and against the Democrats to vote in favor of increasing taxes. I don’t see where this buys any cover from their constituents.
We were successful in defeating a few DINO Craddickhead Quislicrats in the primaries. Now we know where Craddick is looking to replace his lost Quislings.
I half expected as much from Strama, but I’m disappointed by Howard.
Would I support Strama and Howard over their Republican opponents? Of course. I'm just saying that Strama and Howard are starting to look like Vilma Luna's new best pals, which is far better than having a Republican hold those offices (even if it's not as good as having a progressive or party-loyal Democrat).
|