Bush Returns to a Divided Texas Republican Party
By Hilary Hylton / Austin Sunday, Jan. 25, 2009
As he returns to his hometown of Midland, Texas, George W. Bush is surely happy to be back in the friendly confines of the Lone Star State. But he may be surprised to find a very different, and divided, Republican party from the one he left behind eight years ago. Rural conservatives in the party are losing clout to more moderate and urban forces, while a potentially nasty internal battle for the Governor's Mansion in 2010 is brewing.
The talk of Texas politicos these days, in fact, is a different politician returning home from the nation's capital, U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison. The two-term Republican senior senator has her eye on the Governor's Mansion currently held by Republican Rick Perry, who has already announced his intention to run for reeelction to an unprecedented third full term.
Since shortly after winning her second full term in 2006, which she said would be her last, Hutchison has been dancing a coy waltz across Texas over her plans to run in 2010 for governor. But in December she set up a gubernatorial exploratory committee, funding it with $1 million from her federal $8 million campaign chest. That move forced major Republican donors to choose sides, and it has sparked a wave of speculation about if or when she might resign her Senate seat and who would seek to replace her.
The sniping between the two giants of Texas politics already has begun. Hutchison has said state government needs a long overdue "scrubbing," while Perry has suggested her vote for the $700 billion Wall Street federal bailout reflects a "Democrat Lite" approach to economic hard times. At a press conference unveiling a pro-life auto license plate, Perry also intimated that his potential opponent has been less than 100% supportive of pro-life policies. Hutchinson, whose position on abortion has been described as "nuanced" by conservative columnist George Will, has supported federal funding for stem cell research, opposed federal funds for abortion and late-term procedures, but backed a 2003 Senate resolution endorsing the U.S. Supreme Court landmark Roe v. Wade ruling on abortion.
more...
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1873143,00.html