Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Please correct me if I am wrong. WA Democratic Primary votes don't count.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Washington Donate to DU
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 05:55 PM
Original message
Please correct me if I am wrong. WA Democratic Primary votes don't count.
Unless I am messed up (a true possibility) the Washington Democratic Party will use the caucus results to decide on their (our) candidate. The votes in the primary are meaningless.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Correct, except as a beauty contest n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thank you for the response. See my response below. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Correct
Edited on Thu Jan-10-08 09:36 AM by TechBear_Seattle
Washington's Secretary of State has a FAQ about the primaries here. To quote the section you are asking about:

Q: How will the political parties use the results of the Presidential Primary?

Political parties retain the authority to decide if they will use the Presidential Primary to allocate delegates to the national nominating conventions. The political parties may also use caucus results, or a combination of primary results and caucus results.

The Republican Party used the results of the primary to allocate all of the Washington delegates in 1992, half of its delegates in 1996, and one third of its delegates in 2000. The State Republican Party has decided that it will use the 2008 Presidential Primary to allocate 51% of its delegates. The remaining 49% of the delegates will be allocated based on caucus results.

The Democratic Party has never used the results of the primary to allocate delegates. The State Democratic Party will only use caucuses to allocate delegates in 2008.


The list of how the state Republicans used the primaries does not include an entry for 2004 because the Legislature cancelled the 2004 primary. The rationale was that the Democrats don't use the results anyway, and the GOP had already declared Bush as the sole nominee. Cancelling the primaries saved the state just over $7 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you for the info. Many Democrats that I have spoken to are not
aware of this. Do you know the rational behind using the caucus verses primary vote? Primary voting seems more Democratic (big D and little d). Caucus system looks like it could be manipulated easier especially with super delegates.

I think the Democratic Party should make it clear to the public that primary voting doesn't count. I did read it in the voters pamphlet but had to search for it. Many Democrats are not aware.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Caucuses are actually *less* easy to manipulate than primaries
Caucus-goers can make a note of the afternoon's results, and share those notes with people who attended other caucuses. Within a day or so, an organized group can gather independent proof that the reported results are actually correct. You do not have that kind of transparency in an election, especially since most counties are moving towards all mail-voting with no guarantee that your ballot was even recieved, much less counted correctly.

As for why, the primaries were imposed on Washington by I-99 to the state Legislature, validated in 1988 and passed by the Legislature in 1989. The first primary was held in Washington as part of the 1992 cycle. The state Democratic party opposed the primary, claming that it interfered with its constitutional rights of free assembly and free speech; as such they boycotted the primary results on general principles in both 1992 and 1996. For 2000, the state Legislature had moved the date of the state primary to coincide with the New Hampshire primary; the state party, citing national rules prohibiting the selection of delegates by caucus before Iowa and before New Hampshire by primary, again declared their intent to ignore the primary results. The 2004 primary was cancelled by the state as mentioned in my above post. In 2008, the party is back again to the "I don't wanna" excuse. As added insult, the caucuses will be held ten days before the primary, making the election even more pointless than they have been in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks for the information. I would like to pass it along if you don't mind.
Do you know the effect of the super delegates? How much power do they have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-11-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If I may, regarding the platform, how specific can it get? I.E. can we put in the platform
that Guantanamo should be closed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, that would be a resolution
And I think it it's been done. The platform is general principles, like for instance being for universal health care. A resolution would be "Support HR 676".

Templates and examples are at the following link--don't reinvent the wheel.

http://www.wa-democrats.org/index.php?page=display&id=137
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bunk
The assertion that caucuses are less likely to be polluted might be true, but I doubt it. It is true, however, that there are a large number of Washington voters who either cannot get to a caucus because they work during the time of the caucus, or there is no caucus in their area, perhaps illness and difficulty getting around keeps them from attending, or they are out of town. It appears to be a way for the party to choose the candidate, rather than the voters choosing the candidates.

What would be more important to the State of Washington than allowing their citizens to vote? If the State can't afford for the citizens to vote, I suggest administrators, governors, principals of schools, etc. salaries be cut until they have enough money saved so that the citizens of Washington can vote for the candidate of their choice for President.

After this debacle with Bush, and the damage he and his supporters have done, I believe every effort should be made to make it possible for every citizen to vote.
Caucuses are undemocratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Right. Real democracy is huge cash flows and name recognition
Sloganeering fluff is democracy, not neighbors talking to each other about issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Neighbors
Neighbors talk to one another about issues all of the time. What does that have to do with anything?

Contributions to campaigns happen whether or not we get to vote.
But funding campaigns is another thing that could be changed for the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Washington Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC