Are Washington's (the state) two Senators still committed to supporting
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:02 PM
Original message |
Are Washington's (the state) two Senators still committed to supporting |
|
Sen Clinton in spite of the fact that Washington (the state) democrats want Obama? And we call this democracy.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The superdelegates are free to support whomever they wish |
|
I disagree with their choice, but it's entirely within their right.
Richardson is going against the vote in his state to support Obama, isn't he?
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Just because it is in their "rights" doesn't make it right. The Super-duper-delegate |
|
system is to keep the rank and file in our places. The Party movers will have the last say. They would rather risk a McCain victory than yield to the grass-roots. Damn them, damn them I say.
|
Upton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They should be supporting Obama |
|
considering the way Clinton was beaten decisively in both the caucus and the beauty contest. Gov. Gregoire is doing the right thing and has my respect, Cantwell and Murray are losing my respect and may lose my vote should their undemocratic stands continue.
|
Evergreen Emerald
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. So, Richardson, Kerry, Kennedy should be supporting Clinton? |
|
is that what you are suggesting?
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yes, if their constituents voted for Clinton. They should represent their constituents. |
|
Or do I misunderstand a democracy. What is the purpose of the super-duper-delegates???
|
Evergreen Emerald
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. you are asking to change the rules in the middle of the election |
|
Historically the super delegates were independent, beyond the sway of politics and hype. They are to evaluate the candidates and decide for themselves.
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-24-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Are you willing to accept Sen Clinton as our candidate even when the majority of the people |
|
want Obama? How is this democratic? Yes, the rules currently give the party insiders the power to do this but at what cost? How can this help the Party? I am assuming your candidate of choice is Sen Clinton, so you will accept winning at any cost? You are willing to risk loosing in the general to McBush. I am fighting corporate control of both the republican party and the Democratic Party. DLC equals more corporatism.
|
eridani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-23-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
4. You can lobby all the superdelegates at the following site |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.