Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

fucking gableman fuckstick asshole fucking criminal basTURD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Wisconsin Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:46 AM
Original message
fucking gableman fuckstick asshole fucking criminal basTURD
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 11:48 AM by Dinger
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt_and_politics/article_a6ae0334-cfaf-11de-8d04-001cc4c03286.html


A three-judge panel is recommending that the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismiss an ethics complaint against Justice Michael Gableman for a commercial Gableman’s campaign ran during his 2008 run for the high court.
In a 37-page recommendation issued Thursday, the three appeals court judges said the ad, which criticized incumbent Justice Louis Butler, did not violate the state’s Code of Judicial Conduct. The case now goes to Gableman’s six peers on the Supreme Court.
The Wisconsin Judicial Commission charged that Gableman violated a rule that bars judicial candidates from knowingly misrepresenting “the identity, qualifications, present position, or other fact concerning the candidate or an opponent.”
However, judges Harry Snyder, Ralph Adam Fine and David Deininger found that each of the statements in the commercial was true, even if the words, taken together, left a false or misleading impression. Snyder and Deininger found that discipline could only be imposed for “objectively false statements.”
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how they came to this opinion.
James Bopp called the decision a “complete vindication of Justice Gableman’s position that the ad was truthful and violated no canons of ethics.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dembotoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. it should be our duty to remind folks that both ziegler and gableman
have no ethics
thus the decisions of this court of by definition tainted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Wisconsin Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC