The Journal-Sentinel headline on this said, "Walker doesn't foresee pardon for Jensen." But the pertinent quote: Asked Tuesday if he would consider pardoning Jensen, Walker shook his head and said, "No, I think the criminal justice process worked itself out. The judge made a decision there. My guess is he's just ready to move forward."
http://dev.www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/112279294.htmlNot exactly an unequivocal statement, is it? I liked some of the comments on that story:
In consideration for the proper amount of cash, he might be persuaded to change his mind...
Scooter for DOA Secretary!
Scotty better keep his focus on those 250,000 new jobs he's gonna create, he's already 5000 in the hole from the train debacle.
Why should Scotty pardon him? What is in it for him? Scotty does things when he himself gets something out of it. It is kind of the "play for pay". If there is no incentive for Scotty, he won't do anything. Scotty is an immature arse with a humongous ego.
Headline should read: "Walker doesn't foresee much of anything"