Brookfield city submitted # of votes twice

[goddess40]

Brookfield city clerk submitted her vote totals and then was requested by Kathy N. to resubmit them in a different column form. City clerk was puzzled about this but then did resubmit them in the different column form. However, she was more puzzled when the requested column form was not used by the county clerk. Could Kathy N. have added Brookfield city's numbers twice? I believe Kathy N. is not only incompetent she is crooked. And if she get in trouble for this she will be rewarded with a nice appointment by Gov. Wanker.

[Jackpine Radical]

1. Is there "room" in the totals for that to have happened?

14,000 is a large number to hide. What would they have done in order to cover their tracks here?

[PeaceNikki]

2. Ramona Kitzinger checked and confirmed the 14k were not in the #'s released to media.

So, yes.

THIS is why I think the case of the Brookfield votes WAS a mistake. A dumb incompetent mistake. They HAD to know it would launch a full investigation.

GAB is investigating with a fine-tooth comb. The Kloppenburg campaign is investigating with an even finer tooth comb. And there will be a recount in which every ballot is looked at with human eyeballs.

If this asshole wanted to throw the election to Prosser, this is about the stupidest way she could have done it. Anyone with access to city and county vote totals and a calculator would discover it in 5 minutes once the error was announced.

BUT it MUST and WILL be thoroughly investigated. Incompetence to that degree is as bad as fraud. That woman is responsible for *MY* vote and I want answers and I want a fine-tooth comb to see if she's made other mistakes and/or actually acting nefariously. This alleged mistake has opened her up to a deep deep dive that I am sure she didn't want. If she so much as forgot to cross a "t", we'll find it.

[Jackpine Radical]

3. I think we're drifting toward the same conclusion.

[ewagner]

4. agreed...n/t

[BR_Parkway]

8. Yeah, it seems more likely that something this obvious would be a good distraction

from fraud in other areas around the state rather than in this particular county. I mean, if I were writing a screen play, I couldn't have produced a more likely "crook" than the clerk of that county as a way to have everyone watching assume it was her doing some hanky panky with the votes while I had the real fraud going on somewhere else, only to be revealed on screen as the final twist.

[shraby]

5. Are there "empty" precincts she could have spread them

out in? The when Brookfield turned up with no votes, took the total and put it there also?

[AllyCat]

6. Link??? I would love to believe this, but need a source. Please

Thanks!!

[Tx4obama]

7. She didn't.

Because when Nickolaus printed out the data the first time there were 'all zeros' in the slots for Brookfield.
That is how she found the error in the first place.