Prob = 0.25 ^ 50 or 1 in impossible

[Ed Suspicious]

*snip

"I see 50 consecutive ballots for Prosser in a city where Kloppenburg had 75%. If true, it is absolute MATHEMATICAL proof of fraud using a simple probability calculation: Prob = 0.25 ^ 50 or 1 in 1,267,650,600,228,230,000,000,000,000,000 !!! THAT'S WHAT I SEE!"

*snip


http://blogablebev.blogspot.com/2011/05/httpswww.html?spref=fb


Wow!

[sybylla]

1. Um, the man doesn't link to anything or explain in any detail what he saw

or where he saw it. I went all the way to the FB page of the original poster and saw nothing helpful.

I appreciate your sharing, but I'd need far more information to take this seriously.

[Ed Suspicious]

2. That's fair.

I might have been distracted from reality by the big shiny number.

[sybylla]

3. Absolutely understandable.

B-)

[Yon_Yonson]

4. Looks like statistics to me ...

Looks like statistics to me and I suffered through it during my college days. We all know about numbers and what can be done with them. I would like to see this be presented in more detail and from more than one source.

As for the Kloppenburg and Prosser election ‘the devil is in the detail’ and there were shenanigans but where is the proof? Hopefully more light will be shed when Kloppengurg makes her intentions known by the 31May11.

[ewagner]

5. "where is the proof..."

exactly....I'm sure that there were shenanigans in "Walkersha" County but I'll be damned if I can figure out where the trail to the smoking gun is....

[dragonlady]

6. The "shenanigans" may be foward looking

Daydreaming produced this possible scenario: What if they really didn't do anything to steal this election. Then when it turned out close, they had Kathy N. do her weird snafu in Waukesha County (which was easily corrected by looking at the Brookfield votes reported on election night, but it got people worked up). That lured Dems to push for a recount. Then nothing significant turned up (just a relatively small number of changes explainable as machines being unable to read human intent correctly). Now the way is clear to interfere with the 2012 elections, and everyone thinks the election system is basically okay, just needs some more attention to ballot bags and chain of custody matters.

I do think there is a way to tamper with the machines, if they can get control over the software that goes into them. Who programs the machines? We should find out.

[ewagner]

7. Plausible theory

I expect something like that could be going on...

I don't know who programs the machines to do the counting and you're right...we need to find out.

I still think something happened this time and I don't know what.

[Yon_Yonson]

8. Food for thought ... thank you