There was a great LTE yesterday, on that very topic.
They don't sell the sports section all by itself --
I'm embarrassed to admit that I also read some of the
bird cage liner editorial section -- there was this well
and plainly spoken treasure:
UNEMPLOYMENT
Sending jobs overseas damages this country
Our nation's unemployment rate is approaching 10%. Is it not in large part
due to the fact that every time a United States manufacturer has a product
manufactured overseas, it causes a ripple effect that eventually eliminates
one or more jobs here in America?
I have been a small-business owner for almost 20 years. Our company has made
products for larger corporations in the past. We always delivered on time
and maintained high quality at affordable prices. Unfortunately, those
ingredients were not enough to satisfy these larger corporations. These
companies sent the work overseas, as they could save a few more dollars by doing so.
So what is wrong with that? Isn't it better to be competitive by getting the
job done less expensively so you can offer better pricing to your customers?
The products we were producing had little or no other competing products. Once
the product was sent overseas, based strictly on having the product made cheaper,
the prices to the end user remained the same. Thus the only reason to send the
product out of the country was to put a few more dollars in the pocket of a company.
As a result of losing these products, we laid off employees. Plus, there was a ripple
effect as the many Wisconsin vendors we used also lost the work that we would send
to them in the manufacturing of these products.
If we wish to create jobs and local revenue, shouldn't we as a nation, as a state
and as employers concentrate on manufacturing products here in our country?
I snipped the writer's name and place of residence, but they're here:
http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/125778433.htmlJuly 18, 2011