|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Places » Wisconsin |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:33 PM Original message |
Is this accurate about James Sensenbrenner's 2004 election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. they would have if no one ran against him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Singular73 (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. looks like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. That can't be right. There's no way an independant would get more votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:42 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. If there was no Democratic candidate, they sure would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:45 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. It lists a democratic candidate though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. for 2004, not 02. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. No its incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Last Lemming (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Does this that the Republican Majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. The information is inaccurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. listen up people... those numbers were for the 2002 cycle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MessiahRp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. No that is not right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-05 03:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Thanks (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:35 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Places » Wisconsin |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC