Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There's a reason for the "tense" U.S.A - Canada relationship.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 01:51 PM
Original message
There's a reason for the "tense" U.S.A - Canada relationship.
I'm tired of hearing people talking about the "tense relationship" between Canada and the U.S.A...Jane Taber on CTV's Question Period just brought it up again. She said that there may be a surprise gift (re softwood lumber solution) from the Bush government to Canada at the upcoming meeting of Bush and Harper, since Bush is happy that Harper has taken over from the Liberals....Have they all forgotten the great relationship Chretien had with Clinton? Actually, Clinton had a good relationship with most if not all of the other foreign leaders when he was president. Unlike Bush, he did NOT treat other countries like they were satellites of the U.S.A... Does it not occur to any of these clowns that the sticking point in the country to country relationship just might be George Bush?
P.S...This so-called gift from Bush is not a gift but what Canada is owed according to the rules of arbitration in the trade deal. Remember there have been 7 or 8 rulings on this issue, which have all gone in favour of Canada by the arbitration board, which was made up of an equal number of American and Canadian members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ur right that if the US lives up to it's obligation to pay us owed $$$
.
.
.

would not be a "gift" per se,

It would be a fecking MIRACLE!!

oh, and the US will pay for all the expenses, suffering and business loss too, right?

right

thot so

(sigh)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-26-06 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Softwood lumber
and their issues with the Canadian Wheat Board and agricultural subsisdies and water issues have been around since before Bush, and they'ss survive Bush.

South Park had it right, and so did Trudeau.

If they can get what THEY want by shitting on Canada there's not much difference between Republican and Democrat politicians and their paymasters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good point...
Let's not forget that it WAS Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia that the Byrd Amendment was named after.

Maybe we should re-introduce and strengthen the bill that was a challenge to the Helms-Burton law (both repukes) like the Godfrey-Milliken Bill!! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I still think the best way around softwood
would be to set up a special fund for the Canadian workers and mills who would lose money, then ban softwood sales to the US for a few years. It's not as if they don't need the wood, and after a few years of writing on clay tablets, wiping with leaves and building houses out of sod they may soften their stance a little - plus when it was all over the forests would be better off and the price for that wood would go up considerably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC