Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Emerson draws biggest protest yet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 08:15 AM
Original message
Emerson draws biggest protest yet
Few politicians can draw 500 people out on a Sunday afternoon to march for them.

David Emerson can, although it's unlikely he's happy about it.

Two months after the MP defected from the Liberals to join the Conservatives, his detractors are not giving up their quest to shame him into resigning.

Yesterday's march in Mr. Emerson's Vancouver-Kingsway riding was the largest yet. Nearly 500 protesters carried banners and shouted their demands for the MP to resign and force a by-election.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060403.BCEMERSON03/TPStory/National
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. One thing I don't get is why nobody from the Liberals is pointing out a
Edited on Mon Apr-03-06 08:52 AM by glarius
fact that I believe is very pertinent. The Conservatives keep equating Emerson's defection with Belinda Stronach. To me there is a big difference, in the fact that the case can be made that Stronach had a year as a Conservative member to evaluate them before she decided she could not support them. Emerson was elected as a Liberal and immediately defected to the Conservatives! after having just run an extremely negative campaign against them. Perhaps I'm missing something, but the way I see it there is a vast difference between the two cases and I have wondered why I have never heard anyone on TV point this out.
P.S...Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised, considering the complete incompetence of those running the Liberal election campaign!







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was pure opportunism.
A) Run for one party in order to have a chane of being elected.
B) Switch and go to the party that was sure to get demolished at the polls.

Belinda's switch was also pure opportunism, but the case can indeed be made that she had more than enough time to evaluate her position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeybumper Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The reason you don't see the press pointing out the difference
is because there is none . Stronach wants to be PM plain and simple and she is willing to take or buy the shortest route there .

500 people is now a big protest in Canada ? We drew almost 1200 people to our neighborhood BBQ last year but we did have Glass Tiger for a band .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Crossing the floor has been accepted as legitimate for a long time.
CROSSING THE FLOOR HAS BEEN GOING ON AS AN ACCEPTED PRACTICE FOR A LONG TIME! The difference this time, which stands out like an elephant in the corner, is that Emerson didn't even wait to get into parliament in order to symbolicly cross the floor. This has never happened before...Your conclusion that Stronach did it to be PM is YOUR conclusion (we all have our own ideas of many things that happen) and does not alter the facts of how things happened in these two defections....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. So 1,200 people showed up to boo the crappy band you booked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. There is a difference.
Paul Martin didn't have a fuckin' screaming fit and throw a chair at David Emerson. And Emerson doesn't consider Martin socially conservative to the point of backwardness, nor did he feel he had no place or future in the Liberal party.

Also, Emerson's not as dumb as a box of dirt either, though he has the ethical sense of one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mother Jones Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Lest we forget

those upstanding conservative MPs who called Belinda a 'whore' when she crossed, yet embrace Emerson whole heartedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC