Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Layton slams Harper as Bush's 'cheerleader'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 08:12 PM
Original message
Layton slams Harper as Bush's 'cheerleader'
Jack Layton accused Prime Minister Stephen Harper of being U.S. President George W. Bush's "cheerleader," as the federal NDP leader accepted an overwhelming leadership mandate from his party's faithful.

Layton, who received a 92 per cent approval rating from party delegates Sunday, mentioned the U.S. president at least five times in his closing address to the NDP's policy convention in Quebec City.

"He's become a cheerleader for President George Bush and he's leading Canada down the wrong track on every issue that matters to ordinary people," Layton said.

Layton accused Harper's Conservatives of selling out Canadian interests to satisfy Bush on climate change, on the softwood lumber deal and on the Afghan conflict.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/09/10/ndp.html

(Hard to disagree when Harper's making plans for his OWN 9/11 speech.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's an observation, not an opinion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Harper's speech today about 911 and Afghanistan is pure Bushism
He's worse than a Bush cheerleader, he's a Bush plagiarist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ah yes, Jack....
...and may I remind you once again, Harper is your boy. You put him there pal. So shut the fuck up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
V. Kid Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ah, yes...the good old if your not for...
...Paul "Joe Clarke" Martin, then your for Stephen "GW's New Poodle" Harper, schtick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Notwithstanding your awkwardly-framed claim....
Edited on Thu Sep-14-06 06:25 PM by Chimpys_Last_Stand
...Jack put Stephen Harper in power. Deny that.

I'm a Liberal, you aren't...our allegiances skew our perspectives, no doubt.

The fact remains that Jack put a neo-con control freak in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree completely!.....No matter how you cut it, the fact is
without the help of Layton, Harper would NOT NOW BE PRIME MINISTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
V. Kid Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-13-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. The thing I found most intresting from the NDP's convention...
...as a far off observer, was the visit of Afghan MP Malalai Joya. She pretty endorsed the NDP's new stance on Afghanistan, by saying that:

....the torture, the starvation and the growing barbarism that is taking place under the US-backed warlords. She is a powerful prophet for justice calling for the disarmament of both the "pro-US terrorists" along with the "anti-US terrorists."

"No country can bring liberation to another," she says.

"We are deeply sorry for the death of Canadian troops, but if Canada cannot act independently of the US government it will not be able to help the Afghan people."


Now I wouldn't expect the NDP to use the words terrorists, and pro-US, in the same sentence...considering the connotations that would imply. Nonetheless, the impression where both sides of the conflict are equally denounced as being bad for the Afghan people, is all the same. Not to mention her criticism of outside influences, such as Canada, Nato, and the US, etc, and their actions during the conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC