By Donald GutsteinDid Canada's commercial press help the Harper government cling to power last week?
From Halifax to Victoria, most mainstream newspapers declared the country was in a political crisis, attacked any suggestion that a "leftish" coalition government was legitimate or useful, and concluded that Stephen Harper, despite his serious missteps, was still the right man for the job.
The Asper-owned Canwest papers in particular pulled out all the stops to ensure the party they endorsed in the election would stay in office.
SNIP
Was there really a political crisis as Barbara Yaffe and others claimed? Or was it little more than a media fabrication? Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines crisis as "an unstable or crucial time or state of affairs whose outcome will make a decisive difference for better or worse."
A media system that reflected the views of the 62 per cent of Canadians who didn't vote for Harper would have framed the situation, not as a crisis, but as a simple transfer of power from an unstable minority government to a more stable -- because it controlled a majority of parliamentary seats -- coalition government.
In the end, the media-generated crisis was not about the Constitution or the viability of the Canadian political system. It was about the possibility of a centre-left government. This could not be allowed to happen.
http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2008/12/12/PressPanic/