Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HillTimes.ca: PM's ... decision to expose Jaffer-Guergis scandal intended to protect his conserva...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 07:59 AM
Original message
HillTimes.ca: PM's ... decision to expose Jaffer-Guergis scandal intended to protect his conserva...
But the strategy could backfire and lead to new questions about backroom government pressure on public servants.

A top Conservative commentator says Prime Minister Stephen Harper's iron-willed decision to "cut the cancer out" by exposing Rahim Jaffer's undeclared lobbying over the past year and throwing Helena Geurgis overboard is intended to end the brewing scandal before it spreads.

But political observers and opposition MPs believe Prime Minister Harper (Calgary Southwest, Alta.) is also trying to ensure the unusually lurid details of the furor involving the husband and wife team does not erode crucial financial and electoral backing for the federal Conservative party from perhaps its single most important base—the conservative Christian right.

And, even though Conservatives believe Mr. Harper's decision to draw attention of the media, MPs and the federal lobbying commissioner with a trail of emails showing Mr. Jaffer's lobbying efforts after his 2008 election defeat will put the government in a transparent light, the emails themselves suggest the strategy could backfire and lead to new questions about backroom government pressure on public servants.

"There's no question these documents will come back to haunt the conservatives," said NDP MP Pat Martin (Winnipeg Centre, Man.).

...

http://www.hilltimes.com/page/view/scandal-05-03-2010
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ZeitgeistObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is the part that bothers me.
'There is little question seamy allegations that are part of the affair—cocaine use, partying with escorts and "busty hookers," links to organized crime and the Hell's Angels—would not be attractive to tens of thousands of supporters represented by organizations such as Focus on the Family and the Canadian Family Action Coalition, both of which have close links to the Conservative party and its members.'

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jan 08th 2025, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC