I usually do not respond to attacks especially since I am on a Democracy site (you know, where all opinions and ideas are generally welcome as long as I don't attack another). This source is no different than reading the Star or any other paper with a different slant. What is particularly offensive is you calling me a name when you have all of 10 posts (including the one you used to attack me). I would never stoop that low, and I respect all posters opinions if well thought out and presented, even if I disagree at least I know this is an environment where all opinions are respected.
I have been on this site over a year and I silently read posts long before then. To those who know of my circumstances, it transcends politics and quite frankly long ago I suggested on here that to me Layton appeared to be the most trustworthy leader, long before an election was called. As it is, no party is going to open up the Security's Information Act (formerly the Official Secrets Act) and hold CSIS and the RCMP Accountable (although the NDP would certainly be the most interested party to focus on this blight on Canadian Rights and Freedoms), therefore, there is no interest in me voting for any particular party at this time. This does not mean I do not read the news, nor follow with interest how the tides are swaying. Nor refrain from educating myself on the activities that are occurring in Canada from all writers and sources.
I call it as I see it. No political agenda. No bias one way or another. Although I could pick through many policies from each party and tell you which I agree with and don't. It seems obvious, after months of a large number of scandals committed by the Conservative government (some of them overblown, others inadequately addressed by Harper in my opinion) there is nary a peep of movement in their popularity. How can this be explained? We are talking about some major scandals that Harper simply avoids, brushes off and move on from. For better or for worse, this is the party which will win the election and quite possibly a majority. His leadership has been lacking in my opinion, but he is a master of political tactic and I am amazed how effectively it has worked.
The best strategy to form a new government in power would require "strategic voting", and I don't think most voters are sophisticated, nor concerned enough to focus on such a tactic. Remember, many people are supporters of their party of choice (often blindly) regardless of the current platform. I liken it to following a sports team regardless of the players, management or ownership. If there was 100% voter turnout, there would probably be a different outcome, but we all know this isn't possible. Therefore, the NDP obtaining more support, in my opinion, although refreshing and maybe even desired (based on all of the scandals of both the Libs and the Cons over the last three decades), will in the overall scheme of things lead to a Conservative majority. If anyone suggests otherwise why this wouldn't occur I am all ears.
I peruse and read all sources of news, and I come to conclusions based on the information taken as a whole. Since I am not married to any one party I find it easier to conduct a more objective view of what is going on. In fact, even Harper is now targeting the NDP, I am sure that secretly he does not mind seeing votes go there as it will weaken the power base of the Liberals, the only other governing party in the history of Canada.
Here is a source from the Star that states the manner in which Harper frames the issue:
Harper’s take on NDP surge in polls: It’s us or them
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/981235--harper-s-take-on-ndp-surge-in-polls-it-s-us-or-them?bn=1So you can offer your opinion, I certainly wouldn't accuse you of anything unless you specifically stated your discourse. You might want to understand a little bit more about my discourse, I have posted it clearly on this site, since you took the time to read that I don't vote.