Can Canada really be scared of free-thinking?

[CHIMO]

In January this year, I was invited by the Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations (OCUFA) to address the Worldviews Conference on Media and Higher Education to be held on 16 June 2011 in Toronto. The topic would be "The responsibility of academics to contribute to public debates in the media."

I told the organisers then that while I would love to attend, I had been denied entry into Canada twice in the past few years – once in Calgary, and later at Island Airport – and that while lawyers on both sides of the border were engaging the issue, we were being met again and again by bureaucratic gibberish and classic rule-by-no-one. The president of OCUFA sent a letter to the Canada Border Services Agency hoping to resolve the matter, and received a boiler-plate response: "The CBSA is charged to ensure the security and prosperity of Canada by managing access of people and goods." I explained that my participation in the conference would jeopardise neither, and promised to spend a lot of money while in town, but I got the same response.

I'm in Chicago today, and a video of my talk has been sent to the conference. One irony in this situation is that the injured party in all of this is not me primarily, but the people who, for whatever reason, wanted to engage me in conversation. After all, I will talk to myself all day, and probably disagree and argue with myself as usual. But what of the Canadians who thought it might be useful to have a dialogue? Tough luck: your government is vigilantly watching over your security and prosperity.

There's another irony, of course, in the government preventing me from exercising the very responsibility I was invited to address. This is a basic issue of free and open debate and the democratic exchange of ideas – not one of a potential threat to the nation's security.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/jun/16/bill-ayers-banned-canada

[CanSocDem]

1. Well, we know Harper is....

As the public space contracts, the real victim becomes truth, honesty, integrity, curiosity, imagination, freedom itself.

Everything about this government suggests they truly fear the 'public'. Shrinking the 'public space', along with the 'public opinion' (as in their attempts to eliminate the national census) makes it clear that whatever the interests of the general public, the Conservatives have decided the public interest IS NOT a goal worth pursuing.

Led by Harper, every petty bureaucrat, down to the 'border guard', gets to inject his or her own values into the governing of Canada. This isn't what Canadians voted for, is it?

.

[Darth_Kitten]

2. This is only too true.

:(